Cover of Metallica St. Anger
FedeHetfield

• Rating:

For metallica fans,heavy metal lovers,music critics,rock and metal listeners,fans of early 2000s metal,listeners interested in band evolution
 Share

THE REVIEW

Lars called it "an experiment"; I don't know about you, but once again, we have to forgive him. "St. Anger" was released in 2003, with the most acclaimed previews citing a return to the old days, essentially, a Metal CD... with a capital M (?).

It's been 4 years, and still today, we wonder how Metallica got to this point, not having demonstrated once again their ability to create something truly artistic. Now, we're not asking Avril Lavigne to compose serious music... that would be impossible! It's a bit like asking a lump of dung to transform into a flower; here, we're demanding that a withered flower return to its natural form, because that's how a flower showcases its beauty... that's Metallica: from Load onwards, it hasn't been clear why there was this radical change in them, this music made for image purposes... they called it "artistic evolution" (such a statement would disgrace Darwin).

This 'St. Anger' is a mixture of already expressed and poorly executed ideas, aside from the fact that they seem damn incomplete!! This cover, resembling one of Bossi's hands at a league congress, more or less suggests that you're facing a powerful, aggressive album... And indeed it is!! This album is notably hard! (damn, how did they do it?) You notice it right from the first track, "Frantic," a modest piece with fairly fast riffs and an catchy rhythm... However, what we'll notice right from the start is that Hetfield uses a new singing style, a cross between Bizkit parodies and a bird stuck up a butt, is that all? Wait! I know you know... but let's move on... The second track "St. Anger" we all know, it's the hit song of the album, the most digestible to the ears of someone who knows nothing about metal (no, I've been too harsh); thinking about it a bit... this song is still quite fast, significantly repetitive but still with a decent rhythm compared to previous years (those of Load and Reload), what makes it unlistenable or underrated in certain parts? We find the same problem in the third track "Some Kind of Monster": long, heavy, and borderline crossover. But what really underwhelms all the songs on the album (but especially this last one) is Ulrich... no! wait... Ulrich... not his drums... Ulrich!! It's Ulrich who has to decide the tuning of his bin!! and this costs him at least 2 stars to be deducted, horrible!!! Impossible to digest!!

Back to the songs, I'd also like to point out that here it's not about metal... but poorly played noise, or worse yet... Crossover songs. (..oh yes it's true that the 'Tallica were Crossover, who knew? ) "Dirty Window", "Invisible Kid" and "My World": the topics say it all, angry and heavy pieces both in sound and in digestibility, with some fast nuances in the first mentioned, still, all songs that have had their say with other artists like Korn, SOAD, Limp Bizkit and company, usually these things are not typical of Metallica. In the second half of this CD, they really hit rock bottom: "Shoot me again" may have a raw and heavy sound, but it doesn't even reach its decency due to these continuous flaws (voice, instruments, monotony) that over time seem to integrate into the entire work, the same fate with "Sweet Amber": modest in rhythm but indigestible in sound. Now to "The Unnamed Feeling", a piece that in my opinion needed more work... and how could it be elaborated? After 3 years between detoxifications and surrounded cameras (ah... the movie, of course! It couldn't have been a setup!?) what do you expect them to propose? As soon as they found some small idea wedged in their head, things get faster and money is guaranteed, the four horsemen are cunning... But ideas in the end are exhausted, and what's left will be "Purify" and "All Within My Hands," the worst songs ever proposed in Metallica's history... noisy and unlistenable.

In conclusion, as the Metallica made us understand, there were some problems amidst this album that didn't allow for enough time to better work on this effort and bring out ideas. Surely, this one could have been avoided!! And Kirk, I want to know if Kirk was there!! He's not on this record!! Tell me where he is? Well... now that most likely the new album will be released, hopefully, they've had the space to work better this time and will not mess up!!

Loading comments  slowly

Summary by Bot

The review criticizes Metallica's 2003 album St. Anger as a failed experiment lacking artistic merit. It condemns the vocal style, instrument tuning, and incomplete ideas. While the album attempts a return to heavy metal roots, it ends up sounding like poorly executed crossover noise. The reviewer expresses disappointment in the band's direction and hopes for improvement in future releases.

Tracklist Lyrics Videos

03   Some Kind of Monster (08:25)

Read lyrics

04   Dirty Window (05:24)

Read lyrics

05   Invisible Kid (08:30)

Read lyrics

07   Shoot Me Again (07:10)

Read lyrics

09   The Unnamed Feeling (07:09)

Read lyrics

11   All Within My Hands (08:49)

Read lyrics

Metallica

Metallica is an American heavy metal band formed in 1981 by James Hetfield and Lars Ulrich. They rose from the Bay Area thrash scene with early albums like Kill 'Em All and Ride the Lightning, achieved mainstream success with 1991's Metallica (The Black Album), and have released a long-running and often debated catalog since.
173 Reviews

Other reviews

By cliffburton86

 An album as aggressive as a dog whose bone is taken from its mouth!

 James Hetfield has a fierce voice as if he wants to say to the whole world: 'I'm back, bastards!!! Sad but true!!!'


By Big D

 The first peculiarity that strikes the listener concerns the sound clarity: practically nonexistent, and this could be a point in its favor because it might (very remotely) recall the times of 'Kill'em All'.

 In conclusion, I do not believe that St. Anger is a bad album, but a 'different' album.


By El minchia

 Metallica with St. Anger managed to elevate the role of crap beyond levels that even Elio couldn’t imagine.

 Listening to those drums, you can’t help but realize it’s pans and dishes!


By Brizz89

 "Metallica is not Nu Metal, but they wanted to enter the Olympus of the commercial, and they succeeded, considering the sales."

 "This album is truly the worst in their entire discography, and its complete anonymity speaks volumes about how the future of this band will be."


By pep 92

 The tracks are impressively repetitive, it’s almost as if Hetfield and company enjoyed pressing the LOOP button continuously.

 The only good thing about 'St. Anger' is the cover, that’s it.


There are 14 reviews of St. Anger on DeBaser.
You can find all the details on the work page.