Cover of M. Night Shyamalan Glass
marcomaisetti

• Rating:

For m. night shyamalan fans,superhero movie lovers,film critics and enthusiasts,viewers interested in screenwriting,audiences following shyamalan’s work
 Share

THE REVIEW

If M. Night Shyamalan had stopped at The Sixth Sense, it would have been better. After that, it has been a continuous regression. He had slightly raised the bar with The Visit and Split, which now seem like the last acts of a dying man. In Glass, he is rambling, verbose, absurd, boring, and unusually unable to compensate for the usual problems of a questionable screenplay with the good directing technique he had been acknowledged for. This film, when it seems to reach a concluding point (to the relief of the yawning audience), keeps resurrecting up to a tragicomic epilogue as relevant as a Di Maio speech: just believe it truly, and anyone can transform into a superhero and defeat the strong powers. Pretentious.

Loading comments  slowly

Summary by Bot

The reviewer criticizes M. Night Shyamalan's Glass as a disappointing film following his earlier successes. It is described as verbose, boring, and pretentious, with a weak screenplay that the directing cannot redeem. Though past films like Split and The Visit showed some promise, Glass ultimately feels like a regression. The film’s finale is called tragicomic and fails to engage the audience.

M. Night Shyamalan

M. Night Shyamalan (born Manoj Nelliyattu Shyamalan) is an American filmmaker best known for suspense-driven thrillers that often hinge on a late-film twist, and for recurring themes of fear, faith, grief, and family.
11 Reviews

Other reviews

By Il Tarantiniano

 "Shyamalan breaks the comic book’s fourth wall, making viewers feel truly inside a superhero comic book."

 "Although it suffers some flaws, Glass is a worthy finale, rich with mature themes and exceptional performances."