Cover of Len Wiseman Underworld
Hellring

• Rating:

For fans of supernatural and vampire action films, followers of len wiseman’s work, viewers interested in 2000s horror-action cinema
 Share

THE REVIEW

Take overused subjects like vampires and werewolves. Add a bit of horror here and there, tons of action, and you get Underworld, an anonymous film by Len Wiseman from 2003.

From the plot, you already get the feeling that the director is trying to mock us: the vampires, aristocratic and luxury-loving, are in a perpetual battle against the lycans, who are attempting to unite the two different races to create a half-and-half being of unlimited power. In the vampire house, the only one interested in a situation that seems to have gotten out of control is Selene (Kate Beckinsale), who tries to open the eyes of the current "head" of the dark, Kraven (Shane Brolly). Meanwhile, the werewolves have tracked down Michael (Scott Speedman), a being with pure blood capable of mixing the two races.

The story evolves in every single scene, in every twist of the film. Two hours in which Wiseman (also the screenwriter) gradually reveals to us all the backstories that have led to the eternal conflict.

In Underworld, we find a remarkable photographic cleanliness, good action scenes, but nothing more. It now seems almost impossible to make films without featuring aerial shootings with triple somersaults, tucks, and pikes. Scattered absurdities here and there that really make you feel exasperated, which together with the actors’ insufficient performances, result in a mediocre film. Take Beckinsale. Everyone knows she's attractive, and we can understand that the director (who would later marry her) wants to highlight her physique with tight suits. However, it's baffling how an actress can maintain the same facial expression for two hours, a bit scowly and a bit tough.

Underworld is the typical film that I unfortunately believe will dominate in the future (a trend that has already been underway for some time). Films that have in their characters considerable appeal to young people, who, when they hear about vampires and nonsense of the genre, rush to the cinema. This is why, despite the film being quite destroyed by critics, it had two sequels thanks to the success of this first chapter.

Stay away unless you want two hours of entertainment with flips, dialogues worthy of the worst Totti, heads falling diagonally, and other ridiculousness of this kind.

Loading comments  slowly

Summary by Bot

Underworld (2003) by Len Wiseman tackles the vampire-werewolf war with stylish visuals and action but falls short due to a weak plot and flat acting. The film suffers from predictable absurdities and a lack of engaging character development. Despite critical disdain, it gained popularity among younger audiences, leading to sequels. Overall, it offers two hours of superficial entertainment rather than a compelling story.

Len Wiseman

Len Wiseman is an American film director, screenwriter, and producer best known for launching the Underworld series, directing Underworld (2003) and Underworld: Evolution (2006), and for the action sequel Live Free or Die Hard (2007). He later directed the John Wick universe spin-off Ballerina.
04 Reviews