Larrok

DeRank ™: 5,57

DeAge™ : 7248 days • Here since 5 august 2006

Guns N' Roses Appetite For Destruction

5 aug 06

Voto:

Nirvana are neither better nor worse than Guns, they are simply different... we should start avoiding rankings and silly comparisons like in elementary school because music is not a sports competition; in addition, there’s the subjectivity of emotions. Emotions can be influenced by a more or less developed personal musical culture, but they always remain subjective...

Dream Theater Images And Words

5 aug 06

Voto:

Perhaps it would be better to set a limit, like 3-4 reviews per album, having the editors choose the best ones, what do you think? I really like the album, but I have to admit that seeing three thousand identical reviews is not the highlight of life...

Guns N' Roses Appetite For Destruction

5 aug 06

Voto:

There are not just jazz and classical music (genres that rightly find their place on this site, which I appreciate), but a lot of other musical territories worth exploring and valuing, yes, even in some artists that could be defined as "mainstream," though increasingly less so.

Guns N' Roses Appetite For Destruction

5 aug 06

Voto:

The guns, especially in Appetite (where Matt Sorum wasn't there), have a punk attitude that definitely makes them more aggressive compared to 70s rock, don't you think? And it's not that I paired them up, but I wanted to emphasize that the guns have drawn from both: Slash in the riffs (Jimmy Page-Joe Perry) and Axl in the way he sings (Steven Tyler).

Guns N' Roses Appetite For Destruction

5 aug 06

Voto:

This album is a milestone of hard rock, the right continuation of Aerosmith and Led Zeppelin with a touch more aggression and the rebellious attitude of the protagonists enhancing its form. Hard rock has never claimed, dear Duane, to be an artistic form, but in most cases, it has always been music for fun! Closed! The fact that you talk about Beethoven and Miles Davis is so ridiculous that you don’t even realize it!