DaveJonGilmour

DeRank ™: 1,09

DeAge™ : 7258 days • Here since 29 july 2006

Love Contact

Symphony X The Divine Wings Of Tragedy

26 nov 06

Voto:

So you don't know math :-)

Symphony X The Divine Wings Of Tragedy

26 nov 06

Voto:

But saying "I'm sure of it" is not a personal consideration, it’s not subjective: stating that the average (of all the musical aspects that need to be considered for an overall evaluation) of the bands prior to '77 is higher than the average (of etc...) of the bands after '77 is like saying 2+2=4. Nothing personal, in short.

Symphony X The Divine Wings Of Tragedy

26 nov 06

Voto:

Instead, "the little that is saved is inferior" yes, it wants to be a lesson, because I am sure of it. Okay?

Symphony X The Divine Wings Of Tragedy

26 nov 06

Voto:

You keep with the nonsense: I never said that music has been terrible since '77, let alone that those bands don't know how to play, and then saying that some bands disgust me doesn't seem like a lesson... or are you hanging on my every word?

Symphony X The Divine Wings Of Tragedy

26 nov 06

Voto:

I would rather be comedic and vulgar than dull, deceitful (because you attribute to me the authorship of things I never said) and presumptuous.

Symphony X The Divine Wings Of Tragedy

26 nov 06

Voto:

Thank you for the history lesson. So for you, either there are 3 chords or the music is complex? Where do I say that the spirit was of complex, technically rigidly structured music? WHERE??? You're just an idiot, you deserve a big F**K OFF!

Symphony X The Divine Wings Of Tragedy

26 nov 06

Voto:

For me, I repeat, the original spirit can be found in almost all the groups of the '60s, from Bob Dylan (but even earlier, if you want) up until Abbey Road, more or less. If you want to categorize all the '60s by saying they were characterized by 3 dirty chords, be my guest.

Symphony X The Divine Wings Of Tragedy

26 nov 06

Voto:

So for you the '60s bands only used 3 dirty chords?

Symphony X The Divine Wings Of Tragedy

26 nov 06

Voto:

I wrote it in response to "bringing rock back to its original essence" written in the previous post by donjunio. I mean to say that it's better to draw from jazz or classical with excellent results, as prog did, rather than attempting an unfeasible reproduction of what rock actually was in the '60s, as punk did instead.