DaveJonGilmour

Incapable? But why should I bother reasoning with you! The only subtext was Mason, and in any case, the accompaniment of backing vocalists, effects, etc. serves only to demonstrate the grandeur of the Pink Floyd sound, which in this case can hardly be considered a critique, even if it is defined as self-celebratory. Of course, it's incomparable to Pompeii, but it must be acknowledged that this Division Bell tour was undoubtedly better than the previous one. My 5 is valid if we want to compare the Pink Floyd of '94 (and luckily they were still around) with the rest of the landscape of that year, where in my opinion there is really little. Let's be serious. And they were never as garish as the solo Waters concerts. The merits of Pink Floyd are too many; it's difficult to criticize them except for the subtlest of points. This is my opinion. I repeat, it's pointless to reason with you if you think that Pink Floyd ended in '71 and prefer the Cure; we would never agree.

Never liked them... too empty.

But the lyrics weave the story... few have dared like in that album! Against all the issues of America!

Even this one... because like mine it falls among the literary cases???

Bah..what is this stuff?

Okay, I'll try to find it, thank you.

Bjork, are you coming to dechat?

hyper-vitaminized pop-rock sound that is sufficiently modern, always skilled at maintaining the right connections with the more mainstream market = m3

Marlon Brando?

Sorry, why is Operation Mindcrime so extravagant???