DaveJonGilmour

DeRank ™: 1,09

DeAge™ : 7258 days • Here since 29 july 2006

Pearl Jam Ten

29 nov 06

Voto:

Maybe it can be said that they were not very innovative, but definitely more so than Pearl Jam, and in any case, for me, they were indeed innovative, and not by a little.

Pearl Jam Ten

29 nov 06

Voto:

Maybe it can be said that they were not very innovative, but definitely more so than Pearl Jam, and in any case, for me, they were indeed innovative, and not by a little.

Pearl Jam Ten

29 nov 06

Voto:

They haven't "invented" anything, but the Porcupine have certainly innovated!

But where is the research, the innovation, the ability to engage, the great technique in Pearl Jam? You're the one making the comparison with the Porcupine, I know that the two genres are totally different and uncomparable.

Pearl Jam Ten

29 nov 06

Voto:

Porcupine Tree have put their own into it, innovation damn it! And this makes them the best band of the '90s, without a doubt.

Pearl Jam Ten

29 nov 06

Voto:

>>>a reworking of things already heard, just like the Porcupine Tree do<<< But what does that "like" mean? You can't possibly mean "in the same way"?????

Pearl Jam Ten

29 nov 06

Voto:

Yes, okay, larrok, they also rework things already heard. You're right, they're still good, then?

Pearl Jam Ten

29 nov 06

Voto:

Björk and Porcupine Tree mentioned them first; I simply said that back then they were better and that their attempt at engaged music was more than successful, unlike Pearl Jam.

Pink Floyd Pulse

29 nov 06

Voto:

But those beautiful lights, those smokes, those lasers, those stellar sounds :-)))))

Pearl Jam Ten

29 nov 06

Voto:

Because they think they are bringing something new to light, which seems to me anything but new, rather, it feels like a déjà vu from previous years. Empty and annoying in my opinion.