DaveJonGilmour

DeRank ™: 1,09

DeAge™ : 7255 days • Here since 29 july 2006

Nirvana In Utero

16 apr 07

Voto:

Randolph, don't babble on... young people are not all kids... I don't think I'm anyone special, I simply listened to a group that makes me feel sorry, and I said it, nothing more.

Nirvana In Utero

16 apr 07

Voto:

Why are you still talking about Pink Floyd? Just because I have this nickname? Let’s see... if I change my nickname to Hugh Hopper, who will you talk to me about? :D

Here, Cornell says the right things; first of all, he doesn’t make comparisons like you all do, and then, let’s say he puts some dots on the I’s. Regarding the opinion on nirvana, I’ll just say that I don’t share it and that I hate them, but I’ve already explained why in detail in other reviews, and I don’t feel like repeating it every time someone disagrees with me; it would be stressful, and I’m here to have fun and relax, primarily. In fact, I initially only expressed my personal opinion before being attacked by all these die-hard fans.

Nirvana In Utero

16 apr 07

Voto:

what do I know zigghio.. I'm neither old nor a kid.. I'm a thriving young man hehe.. anyway, I’m reminded of the Quartetto Cetra.. you know.. those who had a saffron-colored collar and a fuchsia Marseille :D

Nirvana In Utero

16 apr 07

Voto:

It's always nice to mess around in the reviews of those highly praised groups... you have a good laugh, you discover fakes and oddballs, and if you want, you might even catch some lessons... too bad you never really learn anything though.

Nirvana In Utero

16 apr 07

Voto:

zigghio, who the hell are you? another fake from vic, huh?

Verdena 13.04.2007 Live @ Trezzo

16 apr 07

Voto:

no meurglys I'm not exaggerating! Do you want to see my floor??

Nirvana In Utero

16 apr 07

Voto:

It's childish to define Nirvana as the best band in history because Nirvana is a band for kids.

Nirvana In Utero

16 apr 07

Voto:

Sure, sickman_84, your apologies are welcome, now I will share my thoughts, and I will use clichés and childish language just like you did. It’s not us “prog” folks who have a limited view of music, but unfortunately, it's the music around us that has its limits. My judgment is by no means hasty; I assure you that (unfortunately) I have listened well to Nirvana's albums, and perhaps the advantage of us “prog” listeners is that we are used to listening to music carefully, precisely because prog demands it from us. It’s not superficial music like that of Nirvana, and it’s easy to notice, which is why I feel my judgments are not hasty at all. If I seem pretentious to you, all the better; I’m simply someone who isn’t easily satisfied, because listening to Nirvana is settling.

Nirvana In Utero

16 apr 07

Voto:

oh no peggiopunx? you didn't make any comparisons? strange, your comment a bit higher says that there's no contest between Nirvana and Pink Floyd.. are you throwing stones and hiding your hand??