Doctor J

DeRank ™: 0,48

DeAge™ : 7292 days • Here since 23 june 2006

AA.VV. Arancia Meccanica

17 jul 06

Voto:

Anyway, this empty and pointless discussion has worn me out a bit; I know that my posts won't change anything, so see you next time...

AA.VV. Arancia Meccanica

17 jul 06

Voto:

First, I read carefully; only later do I launch in full throttle. Anyway, so far I haven’t used any "I meant to say" or similar things because I believe I’ve explained myself very well.

AA.VV. Arancia Meccanica

17 jul 06

Voto:

I get fired up when I see and read something that doesn't sit well with me; if the editors make mistakes, that's certainly not my fault.

Ligabue Ligabue

17 jul 06

Voto:

Based on this reasoning, Viva Lì, you should give a 5 even to the best album by the Backstreet Boys... or not?

AA.VV. Arancia Meccanica

17 jul 06

Voto:

And anyway, this wasn't the main point of the discussion...

"First you say, I don't know according to which criteria of intuition and logic, that I was the editor of the rece, obviously I reply that you are mistaken"..."then you change course saying that your 'you' was generic and referred to the class of editors?". Well then, Jim, where's the mistake? I thought it was you who had edited, but right after your clarification, I direct my accusation at the editors in general, not knowing who edited in this case... I don't see where the problem is.

AA.VV. Arancia Meccanica

17 jul 06

Voto:

The mechanism is not clear at all, but you continue to be oblivious to it... there's very little difference between the two things, dear editor; can't you see that there is no talk of music here at all? Damn, did you even read this piece of shit review or not? Why not occasionally acknowledge mistakes (your own or others', it doesn't matter much). In this case, there has been a clear disparity in treatment, certainly due to negligence (see, I absolutely don't want to create controversy!), I don't see what's wrong with admitting it.

AA.VV. Arancia Meccanica

17 jul 06

Voto:

Why "by excellence"? I meant to write "in general." Sorry, sleep plays tricks on you...

AA.VV. Arancia Meccanica

17 jul 06

Voto:

"It's precisely about the soundtrack; the fact that the reviewer only talks about the film (and poorly), not mentioning anything about the very imposing music that gave you major input, is another matter... For me, this is a review of an album, but in the end, it really says nothing. Perhaps the author, lacking solid musical knowledge on the matter, resorted to filler. If you have never read this review, how can you write posts like this? When I wrote "you," I was referring to the editorial class par excellence, and anyway, you have often shown that you agree with them, so don’t backtrack now."

AA.VV. Arancia Meccanica

17 jul 06

Voto:

If you assure me that you'll carefully evaluate everything with awareness and understanding, that’s fine, but honestly, it seems to me that you've made a colossal blunder and that you struggle to admit it despite everyone reminding you of it; forget about the chat banter where I mostly joke around for a laugh, in the posts I am usually serious (just like in this case). I couldn't care less about the various calibrations, I always write what I think, no matter what.