ocram

Certo! Inviami pure il testo che desideri tradurre.

The importance of rankings is something that could be discussed for a long time, but personally, the first time I entered DeBaser, I immediately, and naively, sought out the best review, for numerous reasons: wanting to see the level of the site (which ultimately wouldn’t be confirmed), wanting to understand who frequented the site based on the comments left in the best review that would at least garner a predictable respect, etc. But I found it right away thanks to the ranking of the most appreciated reviews and fell in love with the site, managing to form an idea, albeit superficial, about the users of the site itself. Perhaps the ranking doesn’t make sense, as Paolos says, but I believe that the top of this ranking does (or rather did) have one. By removing from that vote the opportunity for many new users to read this review, it took away a great possibility—and thus the freedom—of newcomers to engage with the monument that is unanimously recognized on the site, diminishing the importance that even novices place on the search for the best review, and thus erasing the sense of that search. Maybe I’m exaggerating, indeed, I’m sure I am, and I apologize in advance to everyone, including Paolos. My intention is to vent the feelings of someone who has seen one of the few things still untouched and deserving of DeBaser be marred carelessly. At least, that is my opinion… sorry again.

First of all, he didn’t support his vote with any explanation and later confirmed his superficiality by asking to delete his first comment (which was pointless)... the fault is not with the editors in this case because they don’t want to delete the comment, but with paolos who disrespected a page that is unanimously considered the best on the site, and the users who regard it as such (then trying to make amends and subsequently reaffirming his vote, showcasing his arrogance and lack of coherence, as well as his superficiality in this case)... the respect that paolos failed to show is the same respect even the fools who usually tarnish the site have managed to demonstrate by not ruining this page with idiotic comments... this should make one think... I believe that the beauty of this page cannot be evaluated on a scale of 1 to 5 (as Hal said) because even a 5 wouldn’t make sense when compared to many other 5s present... if you consider the rating more precisely, one can understand that paolos's 4 is nothing more than an 8 on a scale of 10, and for this reason, I cannot believe that paolos has read the review with even a minimum of attention...

The focus should be on this review, which I personally consider the best on the site (and I don't think I'm the only one)... it is everyone's right to express their comments and opinions on anything... I acknowledge subjectivity as a fundamental right that guarantees the possibility of giving a 1 to very beautiful reviews and also allows for laziness and superficiality... I just want to say that in some cases something different happens... something that sets aside, even just for a moment, subjectivity and could be called relative objectivity... let me explain... in certain cases (and this review is one of those cases) one should take into account subjective respect and not subjectivity itself... in cases like this, faced with a review like this and enthusiastic comments like those on this page, (it is so obvious that it is indisputable) there is an obligation to respect the reviewer's commitment (and to respect the users who have left their comments) with careful reading (at least not superficial) or anyway with a comment that explains a certain type of rating and frankly I believe that Paolos, with his "Good, 1", did not do that...

I absolutely do not want to question the subjectivity that everyone has the right to cling to, which guarantees freedom of judgment and voting on the site... I just want to consider one fact... I fully agree with what Squalo, Vì, and Paolos himself said about the garbage factor... many reviews on Debaser are ruined and filled with crap by idiots who have nothing better to do than leave stupid votes and comments on reviews that they would never be able to write themselves... I am the first to condemn the ignorance of the editors and their indifferent attitude toward a site with an ever-growing user base (my fighting with them has always excluded me from the left column)... I am also among the first to immediately condemn those who take up space on the site with duplicate reviews that add nothing new or with stupid reviews that shouldn't even be commented on... but that is not the point...

Personally, I consider the subsequent Judgement to be their masterpiece in the "relaxed" era that started with the previous Eternity... This album certainly deserves a full 5 for the emotional intensity within it... A piece of advice to everyone... listen to the group's masterpiece: The Silent Enigma... a stratospheric album filled with an unsettling tension that sends shivers down the spine... good review... great Anti-Bisius (great nickname)

brilliant paolos... really, congratulations... what you say in your last comment is true, it's just that... didn't you have anything else to do??? didn't you have to get rid of the fleas??? didn't you have to count the blades of grass in your mediocre garden??? I don't know (and I won't use offensive words just to avoid tarnishing this page that remains the best on the site)... with your first comment and your vote, you made it clear that you either didn't read the review or you read it poorly, but what am I saying poorly, terribly (perhaps doing some "little thing" in the meantime)... you tarnished the most beautiful review on the site with a stupid comment and a stupid vote... shame on you... Ps: I'm sorry, but when I saw your vote, I couldn't see clearly anymore (and I still can't)... but how can you do this??? but but... I mean... a 5 is an extremely low score for this review... I slightly regret giving out some 5s that compared would be 2s... I regret it and I pray the editors to delete the comment of that "user" calling themselves paolos (and also mine, which would lose its meaning) as soon as possible... I invite anyone passing by to reiterate my request to the editors to have paolos' "spit" removed... thank you.

congratulations on the recommendation... I really didn't know these... but it won't be like this for long... go with the folk

beautiful... compliments

in short... very concise but enjoyable... the album is definitely beautiful... just discovered it recently and have been listening to it a lot...