ocram

I thought I had written the wrong title... then this morning I go back to your review and realize that I had really written a nonsense... pardon, must be the drugs :-)... but I’m pleased to see that your meticulousness intervened before my correction... :-P... you won’t let anything slip by me, huh?... just kidding... congrats again Francesco... bye

I'll tell you... the album in Rock Hard was even hailed as a masterpiece of our time... I listened to it and... yes... very nice... but nothing more... at times really predictable... anyway, good review considering it’s actually the first one...

Excellent review, Francè... as usual... and great discussion... Personally, I have always regarded TDNH as the best album by Dark Angel precisely for its masked "diluteness" and "complexity" (forgive me the neologisms)... in their previous works (including the one under consideration), I see an attempt, sometimes too blatant, to chase Slayer in sound and intent... Bartle's discussion on Heathen fits here... their masterpiece, Breaking the Silence, came too late, but that doesn't justify the way no one remembers it... good Bartle mentioned Infernal Majesty, whom I consider one of the many mediocre bands trying to imitate sounds already heard (as Bartle says)... what I agree on is that Time Does Not Heal cannot be considered superior to RIB or Master... it was a great swan song for 80s Thrash, but maybe it wasn't the only one; it is perhaps the most challenging album straddling thrash and post-thrash (what an ugly term)... anyway, the album is very beautiful and deserves at least 4 stars... the review 5... bye

so many memories...

what a damn cover

The album is a 5 in terms of importance, but it actually has some lows that prevent it from being considered one of the masterpieces of Rock-Metal... very poor review.

Well... I share the reasons Jim (you’re becoming ALMOST pleasant to talk to lately... :-)))... however, it seems that my "critique" was directed at the ratings on the review and not the review itself... anyway, no worries... have a good weekend Jim... and hello to everyone.

One last thing... Jim... I pass the question to you... what motivates you to write www.debaser.it? (curiosity)

no no damn... it was enough... I didn't mean that... I just wanted to say that it wasn't enough to vote positively on your review... but as you can see, I never did it... out of respect and to avoid issues... take care damn... have a good weekend...

here... you see Jim... as usual, you felt called out... as I already said, it wasn’t a critical comment towards you (I find you amusing, but not to this extent)... back to the point... of course, you need to write a couple of lines... but two lines (the ones that caz wrote in this review), however explanatory based on the user's knowledge, don’t say much about the album to someone like me who doesn’t know caz... that's why I believe this review doesn't deserve the highest score... maybe that's where I was misunderstood... I agree that knowledge provides more insight than a thousand written words, but... that doesn’t mean (and I repeat myself) that personal knowledge justifies a rating... maybe it justifies the desire to listen to the album, but with the score for the review, I'm not rating caz's tastes or the fact that I can trust him... I’m just rating the review... and from my point of view, this one absolutely doesn't deserve a high score... and Jim... I've already explained why I come to debaser... quick summary: to learn about opinions, tastes, bands, people, maybe have a few laughs while respecting everyone, and interact with those I consider more knowledgeable than me (musically and personally)... I know... I said interact... but in the end, that’s what we’re doing even now... Ps: for this time, I won’t tell you to fuck off either... :-P