Luca-LJ

No, killgod, we’re really not on the same page here! We’ve talked often about your hatred for the Floyd, but you always justified it by claiming they were overrated. However, here you’re saying that the album is unlistenable because it sounds old! I can’t accept that reason; the album is fascinating for so many reasons I don’t feel like listing for you. Now, if you tell me it’s not one of the best Pink Floyd albums, that’s a different story, but this album is off-limits!

Right Socrates, I fully agree. Just one question: are you a Greek philosopher from the 5th century BC or a Brazilian football player from the '80s?

Anyway, I say too many times anyway.

Anyway, on certain things you will be right, but let’s try to be lenient with the newcomers who still don’t know how things work around here.

Anyway, my reviews are usually short, sometimes even too short!

No, I wasn't teasing anyone! Comments have a "real" character limit, I'm not joking! Try it now, write an extremely long comment! You'll see that you'll be forced to break it up.

I've done it before, it's stressful if you have a lot to say. Then in the end you write what you think in a comment and later in another review you find a new situation where you have to repeat the same thing, and you have to copy and paste when you don't even remember which review you commented on. If I write a review instead, everyone who usually writes the theses I want to refute will read it and in the future it will be enough for me to refer back to my own written review instead of searching who knows where. I'm so lazy that not only do I find your comment method inconvenient, but I've even lost the desire to write this review I had in mind, you got lucky!

The comment is limited in the number of characters, have you ever noticed? I should send 3 or 4 very substantial comments one after the other for what I have in mind.

It’s probably my fault, but I didn’t understand what you said!

In my opinion, if the review adds something new, it's welcome! This one, for example, is very original compared to the others. As for the rest, I agree with you. But let's be honest, when you crucified me for my review of "The Piper," didn't you go a bit overboard? At the time, there were already so many reviews, but they all sucked except for Anthon's (which, however, treated the album in a completely different way than I did). The other decent ones came later. In short, those reviews did a disservice to the album; I think in that case, adding another perspective was necessary. Yes, I remember you telling me you hate those who hide behind the phrase "we need more points of view!" but sometimes it is necessary. Plus, it doesn't take space away from other reviews, come on! Brizz89 took up a lot of space on the site when he submitted 300 reviews all at once, but not us who reviewed "The Piper." Now, I only know one thing: this review has nothing to do with the others; in fact, it's not even a proper review of the album, so you can't dismiss it! As for me, I haven't reviewed an album that was already present, but recently I've been thinking about it. There's an album that, in my opinion, isn't well treated on debaser, so get ready.