marco85

DeRank ™: 0,00

DeAge™ : 7390 days • Here since 18 march 2006

Michael Angelo No Boundaries

23 may 06

Voto:

Well, check the link, it's written there... I've already forgotten it... too bad jet... there will be a next time (there never seems to be a lack of them, apparently :-)

Michael Angelo No Boundaries

23 may 06

Voto:

mixed but are we always in agreement? is it possible? ours is a true elective affinity :-) do you have a website with your group?

Michael Angelo No Boundaries

23 may 06

Voto:

I’m referring to the guy playing in the link...

Michael Angelo No Boundaries

23 may 06

Voto:

but what a fine pleasure in playing :-)

Michael Angelo No Boundaries

23 may 06

Voto:

yeah, but it's a really stupid ranking... the tracks were chosen in an absolutely arbitrary way... here's an interesting link for you: have a laugh PS 80 notes per second? what is this, satan?

Michael Angelo No Boundaries

23 may 06

Voto:

It’s especially a bit amusing that Kirk Hammett is the third fastest guitarist after all the machine guns we’ve heard...

Well, the Total Guitar ranking is a bit ridiculous...actually, very ridiculous...even though those tempos are correct! The fact is that there are many songs by Satriani and Malmsteen where they go over 20 notes per second...regarding this Marcus Paul, I’ll try to find out more because I really want to see how the hell he manages to play 46 notes in one second (in my opinion, it's impossible, though...you never know...but I had looked in the Guinness World Records a while ago and there’s nothing about it).

Michael Angelo No Boundaries

23 may 06

Voto:

Matt, in fact, my comments were merely observations on absolutely secondary aspects, which do not detract from a well-written and well-thought-out review... Anyway, I probably misunderstood certain phrases from Squalo that I thought were directed at me (after all, he was only dialoguing with me), and I'm sorry. In any case, you can see that I always try to justify my reasons as much as possible... PS I know the execution is different, but the individual value of the notes doesn’t change... In fact, I was considering the individual duration of the notes... then regarding that, I probably expressed myself in a not entirely correct way (even though the essence is there), but what can you do... I'm certainly no specialist in musical grammar, my research areas have long been elsewhere :-)