marco85

I really didn't expect this AHAH:P It's actually you who were first reacting to some of my ironic or sarcastic phrases (like "Passerby, I tell you as a student of philosophical aesthetics: your last post really makes me laugh." a position I also justified, but at this point, whatever) and you present them as insults to justify your "ignorant, presumptuous," etc... It was you who shot off judging me! And don't tell me I treated you with disdain because I have always justified my positions (and I've repeated them a bunch of times since you didn't want to read them).

But have you arrived at the conjugation of the subjunctive?

But you only spouted nonsense upon nonsense... Come on, now don’t put on a sad face :D Just take any random post of yours! From the groups you presented as rap (which are not rap) to the fact that you think manuals for understanding the thinkers you mentioned are useless (in fact, for you, it was almost a scandal! But I think you're still in elementary school) to those ridiculously stupid comparisons between Genesis and those groups! It's really laugh-out-loud funny! You're entertaining, that's why I stick around, even if some things at first just made me feel sorry for you :D after all, you're the one who started all this to insult, right?

I put the h in front of the o but I'm sure his eminence will forgive me even though it wasn't the first person of the verb avere AHAHAHAH

AHAH! "peasant convinced of being clever" AHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! Sorry, but I'm just cracking up right now!! AHAHAHAH :D

But then...(sorry, but it makes me laugh...) what do the reviewers mean? What does it even mean? They'll apply some criteria, right? Is your opinion the only one worthy of consideration? It’s all too obvious that you’re being disingenuous; one cannot be so clueless...

You get offended being trashed like that, huh? But how fired up you are, my goodness! What is it now, hysterical fits? AHAHAHAHAH:D!! If I were you, I would stop, you’re just collecting ridiculous moments... you’re just kicking in vain... Want to talk face to face?! But it was you who made another nick just to insult me better! What would someone like you say to me face to face? "Sorry, but you know... I was joking!" Keep saying I insulted you first; you just have to read to realize it’s bullshit! Moreover, I had predicted that too... Come on, put in more effort, there are so many other topics we could end up arguing about! You’re too predictable and pathetic...

"If a donkey kicks me, what can I do? I can't exactly take it to court" (Socrates). I give up too...

Thanks to the anonymous, I hadn't even gone to read them. After all, those were obvious nonsense like the sun in mid-August. Anyway, I am sure that the passerby is someone I had already argued with previously and wanted to take revenge with insults like the miserable person he is. I was rereading the discussion and it's clearly in bad faith. I can't believe he's such an idiot. This is the supreme nonsense that I hadn't noticed before: "first you say that you can't judge a critic only by their reviews and then you go read reviews (and you cling to the nonsense that Debaser's reviewers wouldn't be critics, Jesus how weak you are in dialectics)." Now, it’s obvious that if I read a review on Debaser, the goal is to read the review because I need information about a specific object, which would be the one being reviewed. And that's it. If instead, we are talking about JUDGING a critic for HIS THOUGHT, the review alone is not enough for me. The funny thing is that, according to this reasoning (which he surely hasn’t understood yet, he should have someone explain it to him with lots of patience, like a social worker), I would be the typical case of transference. But for you, a psychoanalyst is not enough! You really need a psychiatrist!

I give you 5 for the comparison!