senior86

DeRank : 0,00
DeAge™ : 7434 days • Here since 31 january 2006
U2 The Joshua Tree
Voto:
this one slipped away from me... Wait, I might understand it in a few minutes.
U2 The Joshua Tree
Voto:
I believe, on the other hand, that something CAN be subjective and something MUST be objective.
U2 The Joshua Tree
Voto:
learn
U2 The Joshua Tree
Voto:
Look, Zion has explained what he means by powerful and vibrant rock. It's you who pretended not to understand, perhaps because he was incredibly right.
U2 The Joshua Tree
Voto:
Zion, your speech doesn't miss a beat. I completely agree.
U2 The Joshua Tree
Voto:
To hell with statistics. Is "Exit" pure pop? "Mothers of disappeared"? And "Bullet the blue sky"? Cut it out!
U2 The Joshua Tree
Voto:
Here it seems that being for the masses is a negative thing. But what were the Beatles or (in Italy) Lucio Battisti? Do you have something to say about them too?
U2 The Joshua Tree
Voto:
Chupa Chups, look, I don’t just listen to U2, I’m not some crazy obsessive like so many others, even your peers. I have no problem switching to Nick Drake or Jeff Beck, you know.
U2 The Joshua Tree
Voto:
watch the documentary DVD "Rattle and Hum". From there on, I’ll listen to your opinions, whether positive or negative. This way, you’ll understand what it means to be devastating (not in the strict sense of Motorhead or The Who) and hypnotic. That's all.
U2 The Joshua Tree
Voto:
No! I mentioned Nirvana to provide you with a parallel example to yours (in your case, U2) of an annoying band lacking genius (at least seemingly) that can still be reevaluated thanks to a sense of objectivity.