Fidia

El guevo, I respect your opinion but, to be completely honest, I find the arrogance with which you express it somewhat annoying (which I've also noticed in other reviews of mine). I want to make it clear that I'm not a critic; I just write like this for fun and to challenge myself. If you want to point out things you disagree with, you are completely free to do so, but the manner in which you do it is important, and you come across as though you are the keeper of the truth. For me, it's a film that moves quite far from the previous ones, both objectively because there are no disgusting or particularly "impactful" scenes, and because the film turns into a real melodrama. If you want to respond to Morandini now, you are free to do so (unless you are Morandini yourself). Oh, since you're at it, why don't you answer my initial question? You know it’s bad manners not to respond to questions?

In any case, I want all of you present to answer my next existential question regarding the review I'm thinking of writing. :-)

This is a great album, without any shadow of a doubt.

Isis, it may have been Pietro Paolo Virdis who was the messenger of Christianity in Europe, but that's not relevant to my question and to the whole discourse in general. ;-D My intention was not to turn it into a history lesson but rather a reflection on history and how it might have been.

Populations of then, just like, after all, those of today.

Historically, it was Peter who founded the Church ("You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church, and I will give you the keys..."), but that's not the point.
I repeat, I believe the Church has used this fact as a shield to advance a policy of fierce discrimination against women, against sex, and many other "moral" issues to keep the populations of the time under control, so they would do whatever they wanted.
Just as the Church first perpetrated and then endorsed the genocide of the Jewish population based on the superstition that it was the Jews who killed Christ, I believe all the moral and ethical issues related to sex, viewed with terror and superstition, the discrimination and subjugation of women, and many other moral questions are grounded in the notion that the founders of the Church are men.

And I thought that the driving force behind everything was the god money ;)
@Saputello: the first one you wrote.
The fact of whether it was Peter or Petra or someone else, we can't know with absolute certainty (even though historically everyone believes that it was Peter who founded the Roman Church), but imagine if, instead, the Church had told us that a woman was the nuncius divino.
I believe that things would have gone differently in the two thousand years that followed.
I mean, with a woman at the head of the Church and everyone's awareness of such a situation, there would have been many fewer millions of deaths.
Think of all the wars waged by the Church in the name of God, the Inquisition, the Jewish genocide.
There wouldn’t have been all this obscurantism that has dragged on to this day.
There wouldn’t be anathemas against Dico, against priests of color, or against clerical celibacy; there would be more tolerance and respect.
This is my opinion.
As for music reviews, I indeed intentionally paused for the simple fact that in film reviews, one can expand the conversation into many other aspects and engage with interesting people like you and other debaserians which, for me, is a source of amusement and pleasure.
In short, I was tired of talking about the fact that Dark Side of the Moon is less beautiful than The Piper at the Gates of Dawn, or receiving insults because I think Green Day sucks. Cheers.

Alessio, the final-question of the review. Bye

Isis, look at it and then come back ;)

This would have been revolutionary!