Fidia

DeRank ™: 5,30

DeAge™ : 7473 days • Here since 26 december 2005

Love Contact

U2 The Joshua Tree

22 jun 06

Voto:

Long live it, it's rock, we agree on that, but it's NOT powerful rock.
P.S.: But what do you mean by powerful rock?

@Zion: I absolutely didn’t say that; I only mentioned that both Nirvana and U2 are for the masses, in response to Chupa who had written that Nirvana were better than U2 because at least they weren’t categorized as pop for the masses..

U2 The Joshua Tree

22 jun 06

Voto:

No Marco, trust me, this album is a bit dark just like any album by Blue is a great album ;)

U2 The Joshua Tree

22 jun 06

Voto:

In any case, he still wrote about a million fewer nonsense compared to his review of the Velvet Underground, and for that, he deserves praise nonetheless.

U2 The Joshua Tree

22 jun 06

Voto:

In terms of pop or rock, or, in any case, music for the masses, I don't see much difference between Nirvana and U2.

U2 The Joshua Tree

22 jun 06

Voto:

So let's recap, is Joshua Tree an album halfway between Motorhead and the Sisters of Mercy?

U2 The Joshua Tree

22 jun 06

Voto:

Damn, I just realized that Poletti described this album as devastating rock.. Well, then the rating has to go down a bit necessarily.

U2 The Joshua Tree

22 jun 06

Voto:

I think it's the second one you mentioned :)

U2 The Joshua Tree

22 jun 06

Voto:

Moreover, more than a review of Joshua Tree, it seems like a self-celebration of one’s musical preparation. I talk little about the album, but damn, look how skilled and knowledgeable I am about Dylan, the Beatles, and the Rolling Stones (comparisons that don’t really match up with U2).