Surferkangaroo

DeRank ™: 0,34

DeAge™ : 7484 days • Here since 13 december 2005

Love Contact

Ramones Halfway to Sanity

15 jan 08

Voto:

I've been a bit naughty. In the end, you commit but you're a bit pedantic and showy!

"Now I will detach myself for a while from dear old heavy metal to talk about a band I'm very fond of. That is, the legendary Ramones. Many will be surprised to see me review a punk group, but I must tell you that I also listen to a lot of this genre. I am particularly attached to the punk of the seventies, which I consider the real punk, that movement that shook England and had a huge influence on young people. '...yeah, but who cares? Can't we avoid these useless introductions? Review is way too over the top... I agree with someone above. Album deserves a 2.5, let's say 3 just because they made history."

The Marshall Tucker Band Carolina Dreams Tour '77

10 jan 08

Voto:

Let's say that when I was in my full southern phase (5-6 years ago), I listened to them quite a bit, including "where we all belong." I don't think they were innovating anything, even though some songs were noteworthy. We're not talking about the Allman Brothers, to be clear. Marginal doesn't necessarily mean "garbage."

The Marshall Tucker Band Carolina Dreams Tour '77

9 jan 08

Voto:

Ah... southern rock. They are, in my opinion, one of those marginal bands in the southern scene of the late '70s. A bit of clones of the Allman Brothers, a bit of Lynyrd. "Can't you see" I remember it from the soundtrack of "Blow."

Eddie Vedder Into The Wild OST

9 jan 08

Voto:

It doesn’t matter at all, just like all the bullshit you’ve been saying doesn’t matter. I’m just teasing you a little in a good-natured way. But if you’re too caught up in your advanced sociology of music discussions, I’ll drop it. Don’t you think you’re being a bit full of yourself?

Eddie Vedder Into The Wild OST

9 jan 08

Voto:

I almost forgot the marks.

Eddie Vedder Into The Wild OST

9 jan 08

Voto:

It seems to me that the level of mental gymnastics has skyrocketed with the new year. It feels like no one has understood that reviewing something that's already been reviewed (and well, at that) is incredibly annoying. Anyway, this is a great album, period. It doesn't change music but is enjoyable to listen to. Sure, it doesn’t bring the musical innovation of the Ghanaian neo-Impressionists from 1949, nor that of the Sri Lankan minimalists from 1834, but it is a great album, in spite of the Brazilian noise from 1990. And then "Pearl Jam are not consistent"... what the hell does this sentence even mean!