lux

"In this case, 47 was the most 'kind' and refined" -- it's all explained here. You didn't directly tell me that "I don't understand a damn thing," but that was the intention, right? Or do you want me to believe it was a gesture of esteem? Is my comment relevant to the page? The page is funny, so by transitive property, you meant that my comment was funny, it was ridiculous. And I should thank you, according to your 'non-machista' dialectic? Then... go to the review of Arab Strap, and look at Azzo's attitude with me. Then give me your impartial opinion. Sorry, but I wouldn't want to be seen as foolish.

47 you (like anyone else) can absolutely criticize what I think. Just choose the "Christian" way to do it. I take it to logic because I believe understanding the dynamics of how discussions unfold is fundamental to figuring out who’s more annoying than another, don’t you think? If the things I say are so obvious, act accordingly. I could have easily responded to your provocative post: "Aò a 47, but fuck off, don't be a pain in the ass you’re an idiot, etc." I might have been less artificial, but fundamentally I wouldn’t have said anything sensible, don’t you think? :-) The same goes for Girasole, who I find annoying for reasons she doesn’t even know. Also because I don’t understand where my ineptitude would be hidden... but as you said, your observation is just "on topic with the page."

Alright, I really can’t take this whole little fascist thing seriously, forgive me... In this context "ego & stereotypes" on my part? I don’t know, just because I defend myself with, um, pride? (without ever losing sight of the core issue we are debating..) at Girasò, but if you have nothing to say... why bother :-) As for the other places... go check out my latest spats with other users, except for DarkHeam (who I clearly provoked first because his way of acting gave me hives, I admit, but at least I explained the logical sense behind my teasing, he was being a little teacher with others over ridiculous grammatical errors, which even the Italian language no longer considers... and I never felt the need to call him a jerk or say he made me pity him, I’ll leave those holes in the ground to you) the others all acted like 47 (in this case, 47 was the most "gentle" and refined), meaning they attacked me and offended me because I expressed a simple opinion of mine (as radical as it might have been at times... but hey, that’s what I think, should I apologize to anyone? I always expressed it in a civil manner anyway) and they didn’t agree with it... now tell me if you think a situation like that seems normal, because in my opinion they’re all becoming a bit crazy :-) Je prude, je prude, who knows why. I'm really curious to know what my "stereotypes" are... if you could list them for me, please.

Everything is definitely true... the songs themselves might not be as enjoyable as their sound (truly original, they seem like a mix of Mercury Rev, MBV, Built to Spill + others of your choice) possibly due to the somewhat muddled vocals and melodies that aren't always very accessible... but this seems like the most interesting album of the decade alongside Mirrored by Battles and Super System by El Guapo. Playhouses and I Was a Lover are beautiful...

THEJARGONKING the gods leave, the angry stay! :-D

Sunflower, what the hell are you talking about? Stereotypes? Attitudes? Huh? About what? About whom? I prefer Beefheart to Zappa, and I wrote it right above. Nothing more. I only brought up the stove story AFTER it was clear that I was already getting on your nerves (you had already written to me earlier that I disgusted you, so that can't be a reason). And I was only referring to you, not women in general, since I had previously stated (having figured out what kind of girl you are, huh huh) that "there are many smart, interesting, and intellectually gifted girls, but you etc...". So this "infamy" against me also falls flat. "But the fact remains that that 'little fascist' can't be read" — you keep clinging to this nonsense (it would have been a bit worse if I had called you a son of a bitch, don't you think?) The truth is that you were just waiting for a chance to attack me, and not because I have an exaggerated ego (look closely, I’m just defending myself as best I can, I don’t want, I, to force anyone to accept my ideas... of course, if someone elegantly tries to ridicule them, I will respond accordingly). "That if he didn't have a cock between his legs, he could also be mistaken for an ostrich with its head in the ground" — I don’t know, but what am I supposed to do with a sentence like that? Is it functional to the discussion we’re having? Do I seem like someone who hides their head in the sand? I’m still here responding to you... I think you’re simply scared of logic, since it can only be countered with another good dose of logic. And logic doesn’t account for likes and dislikes, so when you argue, you will never be clear-headed and objective :-)

On the other hand, to think that I labeled you as a frequenter of fascist sections at 47 means that your logical formal hypothetical-deductive thinking had a sudden halt since you were little ;-)

"Well, it's your attitude that's childish," argues the girl. "I'm just trying to make you understand that you're a jerk," she retorts, curse words flying. "I don’t really get involved, you know?"—you’ve already gotten involved, and you had no reason to since you didn’t have anything to do with it. "I could be older than you, brat," ;-)—maybe, but you're still immature; you're the typical girl who has nothing to say but talks anyway, just for the sake of sticking her nose into a small discussion that certainly didn’t involve her. You know, there are many bright, intelligent, interesting, and intellectually gifted girls out there, but you should spend more time in the kitchen and less in front of the computer; you're too foolish and proud to connect with someone who clearly annoys you (without any real reason) and to admit that, at least in this case, I shouldn’t apologize to anyone, neither to 47, nor especially to you, who came out swinging at me for no reason at all. Anyway, think about it while you prepare the roast chicken tonight, how your reaction towards me on this page is based on the most complete nothingness. :-)

Ah no, it's true Girasò, a post like "post no.1 is really a nice outburst, but since it's on theme with the page, that's that..." oozes warmth, open-mindedness, and a propensity for dialogue galore. Perhaps when I said "fascistello," I simply meant the attitude of relating to those who think differently? Perhaps I couldn’t care less about the potential strictly political beliefs of 47? Should I have answered, "Yes 47, I’ve fallen in love with you, you’re too kind!"? Girasole, my dear, I can’t take you seriously; it's stronger than me :-) After all, with Deb, there are plenty of people who turn the tables, so I'm no longer surprised by anything :-D By now, you've taken that Dark Side/Popol Vuh nonsense to heart, and you'd argue against me a priori :-) Glad I replied! I wouldn’t want you to feel disregarded afterwards, poor little girl who meddles just for the sake of meddling :-P

Oleeinar "nice shot" is a euphemistic way of saying "absolute bullshit." The gist doesn’t change. He should think about his own nice shots. The air of arrogance that’s palpable is nauseating in both expressions. Not to mention the "but since it’s relevant to the page, so be it." I have the air conditioning on in my room; I believe the heat is affecting someone else.. and thinking about it, it's not the first time 47 has bothered me, so I’d say that’s enough, right? :-)