Galakordi Urtis Krat

and I reiterate, enunciating: "quote me this big fucking deal." I pity you, you and all your fans. We're not talking about The Simpsons fans anymore. We're talking about Poletti and his fans. who can now quote my dick under the GNU/GPL license. ou revoir. idiots.

and quotes 'this fuck

And now that I read the comments, perhaps Apple Of Sodomy and its discourse on the song form in Neubauten should also be included in a little space among the semi-human cases.

Come on, damn it, this is a literary case!! And perhaps also a human case!!

already

Who cares about how many millions of people watch and prefer The Simpsons to Family Guy? It’s not the quantity of quotes or audience that determines the validity of a product. I criticize The Simpsons of today because they don’t even make me laugh anymore. I can’t even consider the topic of satire because otherwise, I would have to tear them apart without mercy, and that wouldn’t be good. The early seasons had value; one could laugh and enjoy the sharpness of the gags and the socio-political and graphic references equally. In short, it was a valid product. They were The Simpsons. Today’s version is no longer The Simpsons. They are four yellow characters, identical to the old ones only in appearance. In the objective reality of the current content, The Simpsons have nothing left to say, and they have settled into a standard that varies from episode to episode only for a few minor things. Sometimes even for none. When that happens, it’s pointless to persist. Even a product can die. And it does so even if it was great. (And who said it wasn’t?) As a former fan, I declare that I’ve justifiably gotten fed up with watching series that are just empty shells. In Family Guy, on the other hand, you can see the swear words, the vomit, the fart jokes, the clichés, and who knows what else. I see a product that has value, worthy of being watched, and even capable of being analyzed seriously, given the iconic content it possesses (for the sheer quantity of visual styles mixed together in a sublime way) and the general sense that such a product holds. The fact that The Simpsons, as a series, started a genre of animated cartoons does not detract from (and in no way at all) the value of all those products that have taken further steps from it, generating further branches and sub-genres. For heaven's sake, should we throw away everything we know today just because someone invented the wheel or fire before someone else? Let’s be careful with such nonsense. [[p.s.: thanks to deathinaugust and OccultoSupersovrano]]

touching. but I would have been harsher towards the cartoons of today (a bland mess... but a bland mess!! every episode of every cartoon of every character IS IDENTICAL TO THE OTHER... it’s shocking, after watching 20 seconds of blaming, accidentally, from any episode of Yu-Gi-Ohh, I wonder if the kids who like it aren't RETARDED... and immediately after, while I change the channel with curses included, I answer affirmatively, definitely).

I think the Simpsons movie is going to be a flop, just like most of the episodes dedicated to the yellow family that have been released in recent years. Even those pseudo-primetime episodes aired on Italia1 the other day were "pretty crappy." The Simpsons. Still there showing how a brand can be squeezed to the limits of what is bearable, acceptable, and the very idea of taste. Recap episodes, fake specials with the Simpsons talking about the Simpsons, guest stars that have always been praised, vomit-inducing feel-good endings, unbearable musical episodes, well-known and typical characters stripped of everything they once had to offer. Enough. Enough of Bart and Lisa Simpson. Enough of Homer Simpson. Enough of that BITCH Marge Simpson. Enough, damn it. Enough. The GRIFFINS have shoved it right in your face, proving how obsolete, useless, and goody-goody you are. Go screw yourselves, Simpsons.

ValerioRivoli should write a book about Pasolini. A counter-biography. He should step away from triviality. Everything he has written about Pasolini is trivial. He may have taken a film history exam (I smile) and studied the director and his work, but the way he presents it is trivial.

but... but this is spam!