S4doll

Someone might even say Zionism... anyway, assuming that on the internet you can find everything and its opposite (just search for information about 9/11 to get 200,000 different versions), I asked a question. That is, if Spielberg is "the spearhead of cinematic propaganda for Zionism in the world," how do you explain a film like Munich? I eagerly await a valid answer.

He directed only the first and second, but wrote and produced the abominable third and fourth episodes (the fourth is known as The return of TCM, and it's one of the most obscene films ever seen, despite a respectable cast link rotto The TCM remake is by Nispel; when I spoke of Aja I was referring to Hills Have Eyes by Craven, I thought it was clear. Nowadays, I don't think I would give a clean 5 stars to any classic horror (although I would agree to give 5 to this or other milestones like Night of the Living Dead), also because having gulped down most of the American and European productions (and being quite skeptical about the Asian ones), these films have largely exhausted their "charge." Rather, I find slasher/trash/gore productions, even vintage ones, definitely more satisfying (e.g., Cannibal Holocaust, which I would still give a 5 today). Nonetheless, the original TCM still deserves a 4, and it doesn't seem like a low rating to me.

from 2003, pardon

Well... 5 stars is the historical rating and the judgment to be given in the context of the era... it wasn't bad, but today I would never give it more than 4. The sequels, even those made by Hooper, are truly terrible, while the '93 remake is adequate (let's say a 6 out of 10). Speaking of Craven, Aja's remake of Hills Have Eyes is decent, better than the original but not essential.

For a while now, I've switched to slashers and can no longer enjoy classic horror... but I think 5 stars is too much, Carpenter has done better in the past.

Oh, just to say, the cast of this film is heads and shoulders above that of any other drug movie, to put it bluntly. You can't say the characters aren't believable, absolutely not.

Ah, I imagine that for galakordi and tabba, Munich is also a film of Zionist propaganda xD

but what mannerism and Zionist rhetoric... what the hell are you smoking? Poletti is a fascist, so we could also not care less about his opinion, but the fact that others also bring up Zionist plots in the background is quite amusing... bring some evidence to support your conspiracy theories, then we will start to determine who the "director-fools" are.

You gave only 4??? This movie is a manifesto of the '80s!

Yes, good movie but it's not a miracle... good music though :D