S4doll

I liked the book, and I didn't mind the film, certainly imperfect, but very well crafted in the smallest details. Tykwer knows how to surround himself well and is very skilled; other directors would have inevitably steered the film towards different themes to avoid crashing, while the German has the balls to risk it all. In short, I believe that many of the film's limitations can be attributed to the medium rather than to those who worked on the porting. I would give it 3 and a half, but since everyone has been strict, I'm happy to round it up to 4.

np, I didn't want to argue :) but suggest some cooler games, this is trash unworthy.

I wanted to say what Bartle said, more or less.

but in fact this habit of quoting every single sentence to tear it apart is quite unpleasant... I had to give in because the friend only communicates this way, but it's really ugly to look at, I might just refrain. Fake discussion, a fake that doesn’t make you laugh and doesn’t troll properly is a useless fake, but if the friend is actually schizophrenic then it all makes sense.

Now I would be stupid because I expect a movie like this, regardless of the level of hotness splashing around, to at least have a decent plot. I must be crazy to have such ambitions. The funny thing is that then you write decisively and bluntly: "The plot is shit," "only an idiot can hope to find an interesting plot when faced with 5 playmates who go bum bum with giant robots, kill dragons, and fight nazizombies." Uh, I see you’re feeling pretty confident. I like that about you. Too bad if we go back to your previous posts we find: "reading 'it has a weak plot' really makes my balls turn." In short, make up your mind, it pisses you off when someone points out that the plot is weak, but then you write that the plot is shit. Look, you can tell me if you’re schizophrenic; don’t worry, unlike the movie, I won’t send you to get lobotomized.

Sorry, I don't have an anti-fake detector, I don't post with 10 different nicknames, it's not like I can know you're Nes, and above all, I don't give a damn. And to think that in my first comment I even distance myself, I clearly say that I hope the same idiots who infest IMDb come out, believing that the rest of the world hasn't understood this little film. You know what's the funny part? I could counter every one of your desperate attempts at reasoning point by point, and it wouldn't do any good; it's easier to defeat cancer than to reason with fanboys. Like when you emphasize that you only mentioned the Italian critics, too bad this film has been crucified by the whole world, not just the Italian critics (who I couldn’t care less about); what the hell, are they all idiots? The whole world? I like it when you run out of arguments and point out that I called the plot flat, when hey, we have a screenplay written in 15 minutes seasoned with an intro, video game action phases, and a finale. More concrete stuff happens in an episode of the Robinsons than in the roughly 2 hours of this film. I love when you say, “now if it was all obvious, go ahead and deduce things on your own,” about a trivial detail that doesn't change the meaning of the film by a hair, and you make it a capital issue. Too bad, because I was almost curious to know what insignificant gem I had missed, but now I'm not anymore. Then there's Lynch, whom I brought up thinking no one would dare to quote in this context, but you keep throwing me in every comment. So, thanks, you did exactly what I hoped not to see since my first comment; you brought IMDb into Debaser. On this sad note, there’s little to add; what needed to be said has been said. Aloha.

It seems as interesting as counting the hairs on your ass; really, with all the playful stuff available, do you feel the need to dig up this trash? I don't know what SpinTopGames are, but I'm almost sure that PvZ is by PopCap (and recently, by EA).

P.S. I'm currently reading some of your comments in response to JDV, and what do I find? "I was just saying that if you want to criticize the plot (which you can do perfectly since it sucks), it's a good idea to understand it (which no one here did, except for copying what I had to explain)." So, just to stay on the topic of embarrassing fanboyism, from your point of view, of course, we're all idiots who understood the plot thanks to YOU! Incredible. But then again, why should I be surprised? You believe that 80% of the global criticism consists of idiots who don't understand a teenage movie, so it's not surprising that you consider yourself part of a select group of the enlightened who grasped a film so complex that mere mortals can't understand it. It must feel great to be able to comprehend films as challenging as Sucker Punch; you should open a school to help the rest of the world understand how advanced you are and pass on your knowledge to future generations. Thank you for the enlightenment. Really. From the heart.

Popcornshomething, you’re not a careful reader; otherwise, you would have figured out by yourself that regarding the "complexity of the plot," I was primarily responding to good old Nes, who even calls anyone who dares to criticize the film's depth "slow," "stupid," not to mention "thick" — he directly calls me an ostrich in closing (which honestly makes me smile, it’s a new insult for me). But then, you keep bringing up the issue of "critics who don't understand a damn thing"? Why? Do you really think that 80% of the world’s critics can’t grasp a mainstream teenage movie like this one? Doesn’t it occur to you that if they might avoid spoiling the main event that gives the film its meaning (because it makes no sense before), namely Rocket's death, it’s precisely because there’s nothing left in the movie otherwise? Why? Because the plot itself is made up of 4 nonsense points strung together. That’s what I mean when I talk about a flat and predictable plot. And when I say that the film is majestic from a visual point of view, what’s unclear to you? Did I say that the film is majestic in the way you’re trying to make me say? NO, I said that the aesthetics are polished and refined, that’s it, and I stand by it. Then you explain to me where it’s written that all action levels belong to Rocket and why Amber and Blondie don’t count for anything, because mathematically there are 5 girls, there are 3 action levels, plus the imaginative strip club one and the protagonist’s harsh reality one, and the math adds up. Tell me where the proof is that all the action levels belong to Rocket and why the other two don’t count for anything. Then you even touch on Lynch. Do you have any idea what the target is that Lynch aims for when he makes a film? (Be careful, that’s a trick question). You know what I haven't criticized? The cast. And there would be a lot of negative things to say, but I don't have time right now. Maybe next time.

And were you surprised? Even The Score was dull and lethargic, this is even worse.