S4doll

You shouldn't mention the first Saw since it has little to do with the sequels... It's no secret that in recent years there has been a trend towards increasingly violent and brutal slashers, but condemning the genre might be excessive; there have been interesting products like High Tension that operated along these lines... I haven't seen the film, but I've always read more or less the same thing about it. If I get the chance, I'll take a look.

I saw it about 15 years ago, a pleasant memory.

It's said 47, but it's a shame that the writing isn't funny at all.

the sum of TV trash

"Dostoevsky insulted with the term Jew... was he an anti-Semite?" Things are said and done in the context of the time; today he would be considered an anti-Semite, a century and a half ago, rightly not. Pedophilia was legal 2000 years ago because it was included in a context of normality and appropriate culture; society had a different view of childhood and adulthood, which has profoundly changed today. You cannot judge the past in the context of the present.

"If we don't generalize, we can't say anything." But if we generalize, we’re just talking nonsense. Those who see things as only black or white, ignoring the shades of gray, will soon find themselves facing reality, where things are different. Maxims like "we are good, they are evil" spare us. The document itself is not antisemitic, far from it; it was written centuries ago by a Jew. Antisemitic is the one who thinks that modern society has been built on such premises, with its shortcomings directly attributed to the Jews, as if other faiths hadn't written and done worse over the centuries. It seems that the Jews didn’t engage in crusades... and they have never persecuted peoples and ethnicities different from them for ideological or faith-based reasons, something that Catholics have done relentlessly since the Roman Empire (even Bush, regarding the military intervention in Iraq, spoke several times about a "holy crusade"). On the other hand, you make no secret of considering Jews the cause of all the world's evils, so I don't see why you refuse to be labeled antisemitic. Since for you the generalization of things is acceptable and indeed necessary for the exchange of ideas, I have nothing more to say; I agree with myself.

"If you want to talk about something, you must generalize... otherwise, we wouldn't even be able to discuss the specifics." Wrong, it’s precisely through generalization that we throw the conversation out the window. And yes, you are anti-Semitic, because where we see people first and foremost, you see Jews. It seems to you that all Jews are members of a congregation; in fact, you yourself define them as members of a sect, as if they were all fanatics, and you don’t realize that they are exactly like Catholics or members of any other faith... take a trip to Tel Aviv and judge for yourself what the difference is between the men in black (as they are called there), and the young people and normal folks. Extremists exist in all religions; you bring up a cultural issue, but the culture of European Jews is European culture, that of American Jews is American culture, and the citizens of Israel have their own local culture, even if they live in close contact with something that, by comparison, is not very different from a sort of Vatican like the one we have here, but you will also notice that there is great respect for secularism, which does not happen here in Italy. You bring up documents steeped in anti-Semitism and consider them "dogmas" of a cult (and that would already be debatable), but it doesn’t even occur to you for a moment that exploiting others for one’s own advantage is a constant of humanity, as well as a peculiarity of the wealthiest towards others? Yet you live in Italy, a country whose government walks hand in hand with the mob, the most corrupt and illiterate country in Western Europe, a country where everyone feels smarter than the others and doesn’t give a damn about the collective good. But a profoundly Catholic country... Think about the USA, a country with a much harsher system than ours, where everyone can only rely on themselves; are the worst human beings, spoiled brats who have made the world the mess it is today for their own personal gain, possibly Jews? No. In fact, the vast majority of these individuals are evangelicals, Anglicans, and good Catholics. Few are Jews, and certainly, greed is not a trait that can be attributed to a specific faith. If you want to discuss Israel in particular, that’s another matter, very long and where yes, it is necessary to get into the specific details, but reasoning by generalizing is always wrong. It’s precisely because people generalize that we have racists and xenophobes.

"Many of the things disguised in the live studio were dreamed up." For example? I know that songs like Bohemian Rhapsody only work with Mercury's voice, and he definitely had a voice, but with any other singer it instantly becomes garbage.

We’ve understood that you only listen to crap... you don’t need to reiterate it with two reviews a day.