Massimof

1) "Now he is a distinguished middle-aged gentleman unable to react to the made-in-USA horrors that the puppet George W. Bush is spreading everywhere": This gentleman reacted, and how, with a tour that traveled all over America with many other singers (Neil Young) with the sole aim of not re-electing Bush Jr. and proposing Kerry. A gesture that may seem reckless and out of place for a singer, and which earned him a lot of dislike in the USA. 2) "...the album comes off as false and, at times, crudely commercial." Look, many things can be said about this album, but this, by far, is the most original I've ever heard: it's FALSE and, above all, COMMERCIAL? If this album is commercial, we have a diametrically opposed view. Also, when something is labeled as commercial, it somehow references sales; I believe this is one of the least sold albums by Springsteen. As for the falseness, I think the opposite of you, but that's just an opinion.

No, the metaphor is very obscure... now I'll tell you why...

No... in fact, Charles...

Charles, if you don't stop, your brain will turn to mush and we won't be able to exchange opinions with you anymore...

Indeed, the articles have brought a breath of fresh air................

booob?

Who, in your opinion, sounds more original among them?

Among the artic and the oasis, which do you prefer?

Easycure, if you don't get it, what can I do? However, for you, I'll make an effort: I said from the very beginning that the statement was bullshit, and he tried (in vain) to hold on for 850 posts. He came up with all sorts of things (jokes, little insults, winks, cartwheels, parables, sudden twists) fully aware that the sad reality was harsh and simple: he had written an awful piece of nonsense that he is ashamed of (and will be ashamed of for a long time).

Cicciè, know that when someone spits in the air, usually, to avoid any gusts of wind, the spit falls right back into their own eye.