Massimof

Look, dear Cazzpuntini, you have a language that draws a lot of inspiration from the "stuff" you listen to. And I'm fine with that. Do as you please. What I don’t appreciate is that you always, anyway, everywhere, with anyone adopt this "street" language, let's say. Because every now and then you find someone "old school," let's say, who still listens, judges, converses, dialogues, sends aff... but, in general, doesn’t insult "willy-nilly" like you seem to do. So, dear Cazzpuntini, as far as I'm concerned, I’ll say goodbye here. I will write more reviews because I like music, and if they get published, I’ll be happy. You, if you want, will post your judgment (if you feel like it) but, as far as you can care, I bid you farewell here. I sincerely regret it, but you won’t receive any more responses, judgments on your reviews, or dialogues in short. Have fun.

He he... I always make a good impression and it's not me who talks nonsense! So how do you manage to be so "ramped up" all the time? As for the Co-flow that you think don't exist... does "Population control" or "Little Johnny From the Hospital" ring any bells???
Bye.

I really like REM, but this album is not exactly a masterpiece. "Automatic for the People," now that is a masterpiece. There are nice songs, but a masterpiece must be excellent from beginning to end. However, I like the personal touch of your review.

Come on, Cazpuntini... I’m not offended, so don’t tell me you’re offended, because I don’t believe it for a second! You’re still funny, though. It’s true, I love Co-flow!
But, sorry, I first read your review and then, amazed, I searched for and listened to the album. I got it. It’s important how??? Come on, you said it yourself, we’re talking about midi music, for goodness' sake.

Well, I must say I'm discovering some gems with your reviews. It's nice to be "against." It's trending. It's cool. And above all, you can not give a damn about everything and everyone. Then you grow up and that's a whole other story... (there's your favorite word coming into play immediately). For the review, I give you a 3 but you could have had a 4... if you had adjusted. Instead, the album is a real and absolute piece of junk. But maybe that's why some might like it.

Yes, Cazpuntini, but you didn't respond to my point: why can't you separate the review from the quality of the album, especially since we're on a review site????!!!! Then a piece of advice: don't let pure technique cloud your mind. There's also passion, melody, sound power, innovation, the message of the song, originality, etc. Moreover, "the Everest of rock and roll" has been successful, I see. Come on, it's clear that it's a hyperbole. Finally, as for the sound, dear cazp, have you ever heard of Spectorsound? Anyway, I believe that most artists from that era would gladly have had a finger amputated to achieve such a clean and deadly "wall" of sound. Furthermore, it's obvious; it was still the '80s. This shouldn't be forgotten.

First of all, this was my first review. So I thank Debaser for publishing it. Then I thank those who appreciated, even just a little, these lines of mine. A little explanation: I could have chosen another album to make a better impression (a cooler one), you know, something like Darkness or Born to Run. I chose this one precisely to dive straight into the eye of the storm! The review, I admit, is enthusiastic and perhaps even a bit over the top, but whatever... everyone has their passions, and mine is music.
Finally, let's get to Cazpuntini... the only thing that bothers me is that you can’t distinguish the review (or the reviewer) from the singer. Maybe I, the reviewer, am Bruce Springsteen (one can wish!)? You can't drop certain comments without being rightly ridiculed by those who read. I understand that "cazzo" is your key word, but come on... get a grip.
So, every time I read a review with your name on it, do I have to lose my mind? I certainly won't. Cheers to everyone.