ajejebrazorf

Come on, it's not that inaccessible. Gentlemen's lament is way too fun.

enough now, Symbab. One more and you're out of debaser.

which title is better "if i could only remember my name" or "dell'universo assente?" :)

tributes.

It's natural that they depend on all past experiences, but when I talk about a physical phenomenon that affects everyone in the same way, I refer to specific things: a slow rhythm relaxes (everyone), while a fast rhythm has the opposite effect (I’m not saying exciting to avoid the immediate jokes). If you play at a particularly high volume, you stimulate the sacculus (it's funny, yes) which is a thing located in the ear. This is a scientific phenomenon, empirically proven, linked to music, a perfect example of what I'm saying. Look: (http://www.marcostefanelli.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=1953) "The impulse to dance when one hears very rhythmic music is not due to a cultural conditioning that refers us to ancient tribal rituals, but rather to a purely mechanical factor. The key to the mystery lies in the inner ear, where both the organ of hearing and the organ of balance, namely the 'vestibular sacculus', are located. The latter is not deaf, as was thought until recently, but can be stimulated by very loud sounds, exceeding 70 decibels (in nightclubs, you can easily reach 110 decibels). Then, the body receives the same sensation as when it's walking and triggers a conditioned reflex that causes the muscles to move to maintain balance."

"Beethoven is better than DJ Francesco because he makes more beautiful music (beautiful is what pleases)." We always end up back there, with no escape. That is, if someone prefers DJ Francesco, he is right to say that "bella di padella" is better than all of Beethoven's symphonies put together. For me, that's not the case, but I've already explained that in detail. You can think the opposite. For me, tastes depend a lot on what one knows. Bye. :)

Here, this is a response; you are for absolute subjectivism indeed. For you, Beethoven's music is not really better than Dj Francesco's, but it depends on personal taste. I respect your opinion, but I disagree. Because I believe that music is still a physical phenomenon that acts on the body according to certain laws, and that there are ways to make it more or less interesting, beautiful, or complex. I don't believe in "de gustibus," which makes sense to me only among things of equal value. Because even my mom, who thinks I'm beautiful, if I ask her if I'm better than Brad Pitt, would respond, "well, now you're really overstepping."

What does "for me and for you no, but for an ignoramus yes?" mean? And couldn’t the ignoramus easily come and ask you "and why is Beethoven better?" What would you answer him?

So, Beethoven and Dj Francesco are on the same level.