El Guevo

disappointing album.

Yes, of course you're right, but why quote a song that isn't part of this album?

It's one of my favorites by the Beatles, and from your review, it sounds rather battered.

I'm sorry, but you hardly say anything about the album, and when you try to talk about it, you miss the mark spectacularly. Reading your review, I wonder what album you are referring to; I wonder what "Rainy Days in Soho" is—perhaps you meant that beautiful song "A Rainy Night in Soho." There’s a big difference between night and day, and anyway, that song certainly doesn’t belong to this album, unless you are referring to the "reissue with bonus tracks," but it would have been appropriate to mention that, don’t you think? Instead of inflating your ego, it would have been better to focus on the content; perhaps the review would have turned out better. Anyway, I apologize, but this album is one of my all-time favorites, and I'm disappointed to see it brushed aside with such superficiality, amidst discussions of beer differences, Beelzebub, civil services, nursing homes, and Mino Reitano, and of course, the ego. (All things light-years away from this album).

Actually, it's not that good. In my life, don't you think it's particularly brilliant?

The error on Hank's cover is unforgivable. Too bad because the review is good.

A splendid album, a true masterpiece.

I agree. I've seen all the greatest live, I just miss Cohen, and the live dimension of Dylan is truly unmatched, visceral, vigorous, full of fury, at times violent, and then suddenly it becomes so intimate that you almost fear breathing for fear of breaking that magic he manages to create. Dylan is a true musician; he has never sold out like some of his famous peers, but everyone continues to go to his concerts.

Rasputin, what do you want me to say? We need to try to make fewer comparisons, or in the end, we stop appreciating anything at all. Blood On the Tracks is an infinitely great album, an incredible masterpiece, to which most albums by any artist would pale in comparison, but we shouldn’t look at it this way... what I mean is, does a film have to be dramatic to be considered a masterpiece? Does it have to move you? Or should it deal with great moral themes? I don’t think so, and history has shown that I’m right... just think of Hollywood Party or Life of Brian, to name just two masterpieces! The same goes for albums, and Nashville Skyline is a masterpiece even though it’s short and doesn’t have the drama of Blood On The Tracks or the vision of Blonde On Blonde, yet it is an album full of beautiful songs, country songs; all the songs on this album have been covered and continue to be because they are truly beautiful. This album is an endless mine of inspiration for those who love Nashville country!

who asked you anything. greetings I'm going to eat byeeeeeeeeeeeeee