Ghemison

My speech isn't about the texts, and I would say that even the Who of My Generation, by me, are quite pop in terms of music. Anyway, I didn't want to be rude, and like you, I prefer to tackle issues calmly and without insults or other trivialities. I admit I exaggerated by including the Floyd in the genre, but otherwise, I stand by my opinion. The music we are talking about is clearly pop, and I don’t think it’s worth discussing, given its origins; I find myself repeating that it’s brit-pop: then, if this is a classification that came about later and refers to a more modern type of music, it’s all a matter of terminology, as you said. I don’t care, and I still firmly believe (that it’s not incorrect to define this music as brit-pop, but clearly it’s a classification made after the fact). Anyway, I thank you for the clarifications and the details, and I’m also satisfied with the nice discussion we had (a civil discussion, which is not to be underestimated in these times of media arrogance and debaserian as well).

Anyway, dear Zarathustra, I await your replies and I apologize for the errors in the two previous messages.

Other works of the same artists are clearly not pop (e.g., Who's Next or Revolver), but that doesn't diminish their initial belonging to the genre. Of course not, I wouldn’t place Hendrix or Zappa in Brit-pop: the “etcetera” that disturbs you so much refers to a bunch of lesser-known groups that I know only in passing or by hearsay who tried to replicate the same things as the names above, perhaps with less talent. The only criticism I might accept is regarding Pink Floyd: maybe it's forced to include them in the group, but they also started out doing these things; then they were too ahead of their time, sure, but that's a different matter entirely.

Dear de-commentator, maybe it's because I just woke up, but I really don't understand your astonishment: certain things by the Who (e.g., Sell Out) as well as by the early Beatles and the Moodys themselves are unapologetically pop, and since both groups are English, that's how I ended up saying brit-pop, but I don't think I was the first. I mean, it seems limiting to say that brit-pop is a genre exclusively from the nineties: what about the Smiths? The Kinks? The Beatles? It seems to me that you are the one misunderstanding and showing off by acting like an expert; I would say that you speak without a solid understanding of the subject.

this album is pretty ugly

perhaps in France but ours was also very attentive across the Channel

I found it at the Ricordi store, but lately there has been quite a bit of attention on Gainsbarre's works, definitely online because I believe it's imported.

greetings to all...

but how nice it is to self-spam to boost the average for dear OutKast!

and, last but not least, respect for me!