giov

Then I didn’t get this thing about the current average... I don’t know... but why is there an average? My review published a couple of weeks ago on the babyshambles got a lot of comments (okay, half of them are mine, responding to the massacre they were inflicting on me ;P)... it all depends on how one writes and if they manage to interest others... and if it happens or not on the weekend (when posts left by users are scarce). In short... Damn... fuck off! ;D

Ah, I don't like such short reviews. Period. It would have been better to leave a post (this is just my personal opinion) somewhere else rather than writing only a couple of lines that pique curiosity but ultimately say only "the beginning of everything" (which, by the way, including Sigur Rós and GYBE doesn’t add much...). Anyway, it’s clear that they write really well; I just wish they had written more... that’s all. I didn't say “s*ronza you suck” Peace.

mmmmh for me L.A. Woman is quite lame. Strange Days! Now that’s rebellious! ;D

Here we go again... do you even read the posts before shooting off about things that have already been debated? Anyway, I’ll write again for the umpteenth time that if someone is famous, drugged up, miraculous, has five legs, etc., I couldn't care less... good for him or worse for him. That’s just the background. What matters is the music, and in this production of good music, there isn’t much. I’ve already said that a genius who gives birth to a masterpiece (even if they are a drug addict or, for that matter, still a virgin, just to throw an example) is welcome. A drug addict trying to make a Clash album, and the critics hype it as a miracle, God save us! Of course, since Doherty is famous, a drug addict, dating Moss, and acting as if he’s Jesus Christ, I allowed myself to criticize that side of the great artist that all of Great Britain champions, praising this guy who, at the moment, has rather low batteries. Now I’m starting to count the minutes until the next identical post...

Yes, it's true... I'll tell you more... I like L.A. Woman even less... that's a whole different vibe that, unfortunately, despite being very "felt," contrasts with my more "rebellious" tastes. Anyway, great review... see you next time ;D

hahahaha honestly I really don’t… I’ve been in the hands of loan sharks for a while now thanks to debaser… anyway trust me on this… it’s worth risking a few euros!! I nominate it for personal record of the month!

I absolutely love this album. Well, I'm extremely biased... but there are songs here that truly deserve respect, and the title track (even though it's divided into 4 different musical parts, of which I only appreciate the first and the last) is something fabulous and surely, for its time, was a step forward compared to the structure of the four-chord rock songs that were going around. Here, Jim already wanted to break away from his rock star status in a big way. In his mind, he was already just a poet... and indeed the lyrics are stunning (as usual, after all).

I don't know them...unfortunately (I think I understand...). The review is fantastic, it made me want to buy it!

Too short a message for a group that I would like to get to know better at least "on paper." A friend of mine who is obsessed with post-rock recommended them to me. Do you know Kepler? You might like them.

Okay. Let me know just in case... bye.