Socrates

Ah, if in everyday life things could go like this, to embellish. After the first "idiot," I would have punched you. OK, no hard feelings.

You enjoy creating chaos, sowing discord, and offending people just to see their reactions. Some of your reviews are just a pretext, deliberately written poorly to cast doubt on whether you’re really a kid and to spark discussions. Others, written a little better, reveal that identity you want to hide, a frustrated reviewer perhaps, managing to earn some praise, which is impossible to achieve with that tarnished nickname. The veiled goal, considering your relentless activity, is to tarnish this site, towards which you cannot hide some old grudge. As far as I’m concerned, I won’t be used for your purposes, and from now on, you don’t exist for me.

Let's put aside identity judgments, for heaven's sake. Retract your baseless offenses against me; I ask for forgiveness for the aggressive entrance induced by the misunderstanding, and let's put it behind us. Is that okay? Let's do it at least for the sfasciaBabbano...

Not to be nitpicky, but saying "you're not better" really means "you're the same": there's no difference. But aside from that, you have to admit that, although I may have exaggerated in my tone, my anger had a basis.

Don't you think it might be that you just didn't explain yourself well? Why do you have to say, "you didn't get that comment"?

You were the one who brought up the term revenge, or am I mistaken? "...do you have to take revenge in such a ridiculous way?" you wrote, as I recall. Try to make an effort: what you say is not offensive; it's an observation. If I then jokingly suggest sending you to that place, you react like a hyena, flooding me with insults. The fact that I responded, even though I wasn't directly involved, is explained by your conclusion, saying, "...you're no better than those over there" (with the accent, next time...), implying that we (who, exactly?) were like those who were deliberately "sinking" the reviews of Odra and others. It may seem trivial to you, but I got really angry. Next time, if you genuinely think someone is being given too many 5s, just give a 1 and don’t say nonsense.

What you write speaks for itself. It would be enough to read your posts one after another to understand what kind of idiot you are. You accuse people of being "childish" and "vengeful" (I'm referring to your first comment) and you wonder why they might respond in kind? Don’t bother trying to reply; your abilities are clear for all to see. The smoke is coming out for the...logos.

So, established that the (serious) error originated from your, which was indeed a psychologist's "observation", (which, instead, was, as can be easily verified, a search for non-existent motivations disguised as free insults, childishness, vindictiveness, and so on), everything that followed is the result of a misunderstanding generated by you. It would therefore be more appropriate that instead of asking the editors to remove the one (I could care less), you apologize for the untimely, forced, and surprising first post and for the insults directed at me in the subsequent ones. Moreover, given that there had earlier been another "game" that genuinely elevated a review, it seemed at least strange for you to come onto mine to make your "observation", as if you had smoke in your eyes. You then say that rankings are useless, and I can partially agree with you; but why then do you care about the 5? About the one that you vindictively (just kidding!) attributed to me? You would agree that this is contradictory. I hope that in the future the logos (you too don't joke with the nicknames...) will enlighten you.

Sick, genuinely or just pretending, fifteen years old or younger. Don't you dare send me private messages anymore because there's already too much junk coming in.

If you were really a fifteen-year-old, no one would take a 5 away from you. But since, I'm sure, you are not, a 3 is more than enough.