Confidential communication to non-fans of the Notable Roman Singer
Here arises a whole congeries of problems that are undoubtedly all mine, I candidly admit.
I can endure for a couple of minutes, not more, shows where the Artist is surrounded by a dance troupe, which I deem an unnecessary embellishment, functional at most to complement a well-defined work rather than a recital of songs, known or not. In this reality, a hundred (!!!) dancers, or even just four, not only distract attention from the technical and artistic caliber of the pieces but, very often, generate a sort of confusion on stage—a horde of Furies and youthful dancers, albeit very talented, who inevitably attract the attention of the onlookers, who, confused by such abundance, end up inevitably applauding, sometimes without even knowing who or what, or why.
A well-founded doubt arises that the Artist's boundless ego sees the Monumental Dance Troupe, or even a possible MegaOrchestra of no less than a hundred members, as a useful SuperToy to accompany his primary creations, for goodness' sake, the songs.
I confess, too, that I do not admire, except for his undeniable psychophysical endurance, our Artist, whose repertoire does not shine, for me, mind you, with particular splendor, even though I admit I envy him the composition of a masterwork like "Gagarin," eons and eons ago.
His garrulous singing also causes various psychological abrasions (and even a couple of pressure sores in para-perineal areas and nearby regions).
However, what was expressed by the valiant
@[gmasi1971] pleased me for the barely concealed enthusiasm for the artist, which I truly believe is close to pure sincerity.
A hug.