dosankos

DeRank : 5,54 • DeAge™ : 5270 days

  • Contact
  • Here since 12 february 2011
Voto:
Not even in "Mickey Mouse" would you find a review like this. No offense, my friend, but it’s truly lacking both soul and structure. Take it as advice for your improvement. Album 3.5, almost 4. Fa-bu-lous the "seventies" albums and the debut album.
Voto:
Among the works I know of Hammil, at least until the early eighties, this is the last 5 I offer in chronological order. Since '78, it's massive nonetheless, but there are too many electronic digressions.
Voto:
In my opinion, there is nothing below excellence when it comes to Buckley. However, "Happy Sad," "Blue Afternoon," and "Lorca" hold something extra for me compared to others, which are certainly sublime as well.
Voto:
No, I consider it the classic potato.
Voto:
"Dear Batacchi, this is too much even for you" (quote).
Voto:
The "FILM" by the Coen brothers.
Voto:
Help! (quoting Lennon - McCartney) What grade? Should I give it a 3? But to whom? To the cockroaches or to Freddie?
Genesis Abacab
24 apr 13
Voto:
Well, I still haven't understood a damn thing whether my vote is for the review or for the album. A shot in the circle and one at the barrel, come on... Let's give it a 2 just to be safe, because I think this album sucks...
Voto:
One of the few rising artists from the beautiful country, who stands out in his own way from the rancid crowd. Great album.
Voto:
Not to be counted among the cornerstones of the '60s, but certainly important.
Similar users
VitelloBarzotto

DeRank: 0,00

novalis

DeRank: 0,17

Kenny.Club

DeRank: 0,00

MATT

DeRank: 0,00

ZannaB

DeRank: 9,50

Morgan

DeRank: 0,13

STIPE

DeRank: -0,17

Hal

DeRank: 9,08

Pibroch

DeRank: 2,00