ChaosA.D.

I'm going against the tide, but in the end, if for Fabia this book is garbage and she finds it vulgar, pornographic, or whatever, well, that's her business; everyone views life as they wish, and that's perfectly fine. However, I believe that the use of sex as a tool (I haven't read the book, so I don't know how explicit it is) is as old as humanity. In fact, it is often used as a communicative vehicle to express contrasting feelings: from beauty to discomfort (the latter is, as far as I understand, the case with this particular text). Therefore, I think we're engaging in a somewhat stale debate here; just look at television, and one can see as many female anatomical parts as they want, without needing to read anything! In conclusion, Fabia, I respect your opinion as such, even though I think you should be concerned about another kind of pornography, namely intellectual: there are so many absurdities and crazy ideas being heard, seen, and spread that today's youth are not at all at risk of being "corrupted" by a book. Hello everyone, and have a good evening.

An honest and quite bold review; criticizing Miles Davis is always risky, but you did it with simplicity and style (without trying to be alternative). I recommend the Prestige box set of the great Davis, which includes 14 CDs (of course from the Prestige catalog) at a competitive price! Hello everyone and have a good evening.

Nice review, but in my opinion, you should have talked more about the DVD, which, at least in my view, is generally the most appealing part of certain record initiatives. I don't rate the box set; it seems to me like a somewhat stereotypical collection, the kind: hits anthology + some rarities + big concert and commemorative booklet (these things don’t show up in the underground, no, no, no!). Hello everyone and have a good evening.

Nice review, I didn't really like the track-by-track, although I acknowledge that you navigated the various song descriptions quite well. From the album, I only remember "Frozen" and the title track, which are nice; of course, when compared to the pop chaos of recent years (the various Cyndi Lauper or Duran Duran are being torn apart, but today we're really in a bad state!) they hold up excellently; unfortunately, it's just not my genre. Hi everyone and good afternoon.

No one has ever called me a sentimentalist, in fact, I was often told the opposite. However, it's a nice definition; perhaps it's true that I'm a sentimentalist when it comes to music and literature! Regarding the topic... well, in the end, what I feared (but on the other hand hoped for) happened. The ostentatious objectivism, placing art often on planes that belong more to mathematics than anything else, leads to this kind of extreme analysis, where musical genres are ridiculed in the name of unifying principles used again and again with phrases like: "You can't listen to band x because they make stupid music," "You can't listen to that band and then switch to another one." (I dare anyone, especially in the metal scene, to say they've never found themselves in the middle of such conversations.) I repeat, sooner or later I expected a discourse like that from our reviewer, which in the end isn't that different from others I've heard a billion times. Hello everyone and have a good evening.

Mamma mia, more than a review, it’s a vent (the four is justified by the fact that you did "immerse" yourself in a musical analysis that, even though I completely disagree with, I respect), driven by that typical Italian trait of "this must be liked, period," or "look how cool I am because I listen to real music." Honestly, I’m not really offended if someone criticizes the bands I like (I don’t have "idols," I only believe in myself); in the end, they’re just opinions and I cheerfully disregard them! However, I’d like to make a small note: the electric guitar may be an appliance, but some people who play it put their soul, passion, and sweat into it—qualities that, in my opinion, transcend the instrument itself, creating something unique, special, and absolutely not objective (even if for some, something MUST be liked because it is objectively BEAUTIFUL, and if it’s not liked, it’s just because one is slow). So forget the various "experts" and try to give electric music another chance; maybe you’ll discover more "Bohemian Rhapsody." Hello everyone and have a good evening.

The review isn't bad, well-written and reasoned, even though the usual complaints about "commercial," "sold out," "not metal enough," "too metal" are really tiresome... I only have "Issues" by Korn and I liked it (it's been ages since I last listened to it), but I'm not very deep into crossover, so I won't judge because I don't think I'll try to listen. Hello everyone and have a good day.

Nice review. The album is too little alternative, too little underground, but where have those nice records gone that sold only a couple of copies, including those bought by relatives? Those were indeed good times! Hello everyone and have a great day.

Beautiful review, simple, straightforward, and above all truly in tune with the proposal; really well done, congratulations! Hello everyone and have a good evening.

Nice review, I’m not familiar with the album, but I liked "Pop," a nice mix of electro pop-rock. I was expecting a string of one which fortunately did not come. Hello everyone and have a good evening.