fiquata

For the love of God, all the saints, and the apostles: return to the Rector. Vote yes on the repeal referendum for a more genuinely flavorful Gustavo Tanz.

Ezekiel, you confuse everymanism with populism. "Everymanism has a precise purpose, and it is aimed at power. It makes sense therefore if done by a politician or an entrepreneur." Well, this is populism.

Super, a representative of Neapolitan musical tradition... there’s an abyssal difference. And then I place the Neapolitan of Naples at number 5, like in a Masonic lodge :) Funiculì funiculà, Naples must not change.

In Naples, they lifted the tiles. They had fun too.

"What do you think, that your mother is a servant? ...your mother is not a servant!" :)

No, but indeed... I don’t consider Michele a disgusting artist just because he might be a pedophile. Regardless, I see him as anything but an artist. Discrediting him is way too easy :) Anyway, if Hendrix wanted (WANTED) to do heroin, that’s his business, right? Well, if Michele was messing with other kids, that’s his business too, but also the kids'... I think. Anyway, it’s not a given that he’s a pedophile. There’s no evidence... but, well, I can picture it.

limited... oops!

Yes, the prescription of morphine is veeeery limited. If you go to pick it up at the pharmacy, you’re practically registered for 5 years. Kosmo, we were talking about the usual issue of "Jackson is a pedophile," "yes, but you have albums of junkies"... an argument that started a few hundred comments earlier. But did this Michele also do drugs? I had no idea. I like him more now :)

(!), absolute solidarity. I've indirectly experienced a story like this through the story of a friend's family, and these are incredibly tough things. I don't know what you mean by "stuff," but I believe it's heroin. Well, I was referring to everything except heroin, but to much less extreme things. And everything you say about the scene that revolves around the stuff I fully agree with; I see it every day, and it would be enough to start legalizing at least the lighter ones to try to curb illegality. I meant that people should do what they want, with common sense, of course. I know people who party all night, go to work the next day, and life goes on. It’s not a given that they have to end up killing themselves or becoming addicts. And above all, people should always be free to do as they please, always within the rhetorical boundaries of their own freedom. That’s how I see it; it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s wise. Then there’s the comment from Cappio about those who get high and get behind the wheel, potentially killing a passerby... well, as with everything, things can be done with common sense. Some can handle it, and some can’t; I wouldn’t generalize like that... or at least, if I get drunk, I don’t drive, and since I enjoy getting drunk, I’ve lost the habit of driving :)

" But why does one have to be labeled as a "Zappa fan" for no reason?! You know how it is?! If you go to a review of Massimo Ranieri and say that I listen to him to listen to Massimo Ranieri, I listen to Frank Zappa, or on any other page without even a minimal common denominator (except for the fact that Zappa is not the object being reviewed), you can’t help but come off as a Zappa fan. Anyway, you’ve almost convinced me to completely snub him. And yes, Paloz the dead poet is a hero. And yes 2.0, better Nirvana. :)