fiquata

beautiful super, I’ll look it up. You convinced me already with "Arturo Bandini on the Road to Los Angeles"... which is my favorite.

No, actually I just wanted to be agreeable to better conceal a lot of unpleasant things I think about you, in the morning, right after the first cigarette.

Alex, don’t get too excited: I wanted to leave a nice comment for Santalessio. Don’t get ahead of yourself. :)

Nice comment, but it's best not to stretch it too far: cats, once they have a name, always end up being called "kitty" with that sound that is made only for cats and babies... just imagine how it goes for a cat that also has a last name :)
Anyway, here’s a photo of ornette the cat:

Anyway, I wanted to take the opportunity to thank my fans and my future biographers who, through my account, are trying to discover my shoe size, my favorite ice cream flavor, which side I let my penis hang, the (nothing) economic status of my family, if I know how to cook, and who especially linger among my comments long enough to memorize them and remember them... things I don't pay attention to, but they do. What great people. Then I wanted to thank the coach who gave me the chance to be useful to the team. And yes, I do think about the World Cup, but to do well with the blue jersey of the national team, I must first do well with the blue jersey of Napoli.

A certain guy, rather straight-laced, said that knowledge begins with hatred; another guy said that to the last of the fools, when there's nothing left, only consistency remains. I didn't quite get this thing about being an expert or not, but who cares? If someone wanted an “expert,” they would have gone to Scaruffi or Ondarock, but instead, people come to Debaser precisely because the “experts” are fine where they are. But then, what’s the big deal? I certainly didn’t write what I wrote showcasing my credentials as a jazz expert (which I’ve never been at all). I wrote what I think about an album: something anyone can do, even an expert.

"son of a wealthy family from the Neapolitan upper middle class" :)

Look, talking to you will be tough, your Italian lacks the minimum requirements. << If only six Jews had died instead of the phantom six million, would we be talking about the Holocaust? No, so it’s right to analyze. >> This is in response to some idiot who asks me why count the dead. Because counting the dead is important; if you don’t count them, how can you hypothesize that there was a Holocaust? Isn’t the number of dead what defines a Holocaust? If six Chinese die belonging to some shady traffic, do you talk about the Holocaust? Are the numbers what make a Holocaust or not? Have you ever thought there could be just six dead? If you understand this, I recommend you go back to the second grade. "To Giampaolo Pansa of ours" what a shame! I’ll leave you with the last word. Bye.

"but then you report nonsensical numbers, first six victims, now they've dropped to two." come on, are you serious or joking? I said that if the dead had been 6 or 2, they would still have been too many. a little higher up I wrote: "you see, I said 'at times' denialist. I didn't say 'non-denialist,' and when I said 'at times' I was specifically thinking of his 'in the order of thousands,' which is clearly nonsense." you read the comment, you labeled it as bad. I’m telling you that saying thousands have died is bullshit, too little, and you’re telling me that I said there were "first six victims, now they've dropped to two"? you really have talent; congratulations. "I called you a revisionist"; if you thought I believed in 2 or 6 dead, then you’ve used the wrong term. in that case, I would have been a "denialist." well, the discussion is closed. discuss me, and I am not up for discussion. if you want to discuss the Holocaust fine, if you want to discuss something else, find yourself some little friend.

"And if you're not careful he'll even screw Cambiasso's wife" for now it's Cambiasso who is getting screwed himself. :)