fedezan76

DeRank : 9,44
DeAge™ : 6284 days • Here since 28 march 2009
Robert Plant Pictures At Eleven
Voto:
Panzone, let it go. You're twisted and I can't follow you. And when it comes to improper terms, you're number one.
Robert Plant Pictures At Eleven
Voto:
But in the end, it's clear that no one can say in an "absolute" sense that these or those are the best. But allow me to express what I think in my review. I've given my reasons and that's it. And many others feel the same way. Do you think differently? That's fine, but it's not like you'll convince me otherwise.
Robert Plant Pictures At Eleven
Voto:
So what? You expressed your opinion and I expressed mine. I supported it with personal, historical, and statistical reasons. That's enough, we're all happy this way. I stick to my opinion and you stick to yours. You can't challenge everything. Otherwise, I could dispute your rating on my review, which, although saying things you don't like, is well-written and worth more than 3. But that's fine.
Robert Plant Pictures At Eleven
Voto:
It's the same thing I hinted at between the lines, don't read the posts (Innovation Zeppelin: read posts 13, 15, 17, and 33). As for the records sold, record attendance figures, etc., I was asked for undeniable data, and these are the only data, not tied to personal tastes, that cannot be disputed. I agree that they would be ephemeral data taken individually, but linked to what has already been explained previously, they serve to reinforce what I have stated.
Robert Plant Pictures At Eleven
Voto:
And here are two people who are jumping in unnecessarily. Here we go! @panzone: is rock even starting there? Good lord. And what about hard rock with Who's Next from '71? I believe Led Zeppelin II is from '69...
@lupin & panzone: anyway, aside from everything, don’t twist the meanings. I never said that Led Zeppelin are more innovative than The Who. I said that Led Zeppelin are the greatest band in the history of rock, and this was challenged. I provided various reasons. Then everyone can believe what they want. And I didn’t say that The Who didn’t innovate. I said they’re not an example of innovation, just like Led Zeppelin aren’t either. Italian can be so complicated, huh?
Povia Scacco matto
Voto:
Povia is so hated because he exploits the most touching topics for self-promotion, coincidentally always during the Festival. Honestly, I can say that he also writes some nice lyrics, but it’s logical that a crafty person like him annoys many. Musically, however, he is in line with the average artistic value of the event: zero.
Lynyrd Skynyrd Pronounced Leh-' Nerd' Skin-' Nerd'
Voto:
The unpronounceable "pronounced" is a great album, slightly better than their second. Two beautiful works for a band as great as it is unfortunate. An excellent review, just the way I like it, that alternates emotions with descriptions of the music.
Robert Plant Pictures At Eleven
Voto:
I didn't call you obtuse because you think differently, but because of how you analyzed my motivations. As for the maturity of rock, you didn't say anything heretical, but rather a generic statement that seems to be there for some unclear reason. I believe you'll agree that rock actually saw its most creative growth in the late sixties, leading to the branching out into multiple subgenres. The discussion about Beck was also unclear, but I want to point out that Page was a session man by choice (primarily for money, unfortunately) and he was the one who introduced Beck to the Yardbirds (initially refusing to join the group himself). I am certain, finally, that Page appreciated Hendrix, but he is definitely not among the main influences, and you can hardly sense it in his guitar style. Just as I honestly don’t hear much of the Who’s influence in Led Zeppelin's music. In short, I found some of your reasons unconvincing.
Robert Plant Pictures At Eleven
Voto:
But why do you respond to each of my comments as if they were standalone? In reality, in my various interventions, I’ve provided you with all the information you need: technical, practical, and historical motivations. I also added that during that period, success was more closely tied to artistic values. Your mention of various Jackson, Madonna, and U2 makes little sense, as it relates to an era when media pressure became significantly more relevant. But you seem to be rather obtuse, and therefore it’s you who cannot control your passion for the Who. The obtuseness you demonstrate in your statements is evident. ā€œRock was already mature by that timeā€: a generic statement; from '68 onwards, there would be decisive innovations in rock and I’m not just talking about Led Zeppelin, but all the various influences (the progressive movement among others). ā€œEmbraces 3 decadesā€: duration is certainly not what measures the quality of a musical proposal. When it comes to variety, I don’t agree with you either: from Led Zeppelin III onwards, the Zeppelin varied as much as the Who (if not more, but I don’t want to expand on that). As for "cinematic derivation," I concede that, but this also does not impact musical judgment, the only topic I was discussing.
Eric Clapton and Steve Winwood Live From Madison Square Garden
Voto:
I'm listening to it right now. Good live, but it doesn't leave me with any particular vibes either. To be honest, Clapton has never excited me, while Winwood is more aligned with my preferences. The review seems to me like a piece written by the "old guard." It's a criticism I also direct at myself, just to be clear. I realize that the years go by, and it's becoming increasingly difficult to connect with modern music. I also wonder if it's a problem with the music itself or with us. It's not the music of the past anymore. But it hasn't been for a long time.