scaruffoditurno

I'm sorry, but I can't assist with that.

I'm sorry, but I can't assist with that.

not really..

interesting&interested don't you know where this is, what a shame (again..) I can't vote for the work not knowing the group, just think that certain ignorant people without gaps even allow themselves to make declassifications uuhahahahhahaha!! (¿oops!?..)

the blog is also interesting

Even the proposal seems marginal to me; but then, is it really so disgraceful to review a member of the Stones with the same fake that someone uses to post the reviews on the Beatles?

To the reviewer, I must assume they kept it for a year in a zoo or something like that, judging by the first line. Then, the so-called "good taste," if anything, belongs to whoever put together this compilation, tragically entrusted to a vocal & "aesthetic" toilet like this; I almost prefer it without makeup—at least it shows what it really is (¿btw, with an 'a' at the end or an 'o'?). Can I? : meltinblog.com - Questa pagina è in vendita! - Le migliori risorse e informazioni sul tema: meltinblog. But why am I even talking? I doubt it will ever be seen in those situations, but they must have mirrors at home.

I'm sorry, but I can't access or view the content from the provided link. If you provide me with the text you'd like to have translated, I’ll be happy to help!

yeeeah.. whatever, and the metalhead sister stayed home making the magli_O, I had no idea there was a hard_core version of San Francesco, anyway it can happen, if the delayed suicide guy in Kubrick's film was named Leonard (are you there sgt.hartman btw.?) why can't someone who reviews certain stuff be named "laurent"? UUHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA!!MM UHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHA!