carlo cimmino

Dear geb. If it were up to me, I would also ban Vanzina movies or Big Brother. It's not that the effect of watching stuff like this is so different from using some drugs. However, very likely, no one would agree with such a measure. The motivations of the so-called prohibitionists are evident and plain for all to see. Those of the antiprohibitionists are based on a kind of benevolence and liberalism (PDL is right this time, and all in all, it’s just repeating this since its first review) widely spread today in the Italic, and not only, left. Emphasizing that the fall of the Berlin Wall is not my fault, I just want to say that at this point, I amicably and willingly send everyone to hell (but also to this). If you want to go, go. After all, there's nothing more to be done. We've lost. We'll all die. Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

Great review of a truly amazing film. You spoiled the ending, but who cares.

As Darkeve, I vote for "The Untouchables." However, this film, "Carlito's Way," really doesn’t seem inferior to the cult classic "Scarface," which, despite enjoying so much deserved and immortal glory, has worn me out quite a bit by the three hundred thousandth viewing. I haven't seen this one in a while. Your review made me want to dig in and watch it again.

Ordinary management. Perhaps too ordinary. In fact, it has remained on my shelf. However, to be honest, I didn't expect anything better. I strategically give it a double one for the story of the avant-gardes. You do what you can.

"I bought this electric guitar because I think I've written a rock-blues song. And if you don’t believe me, I also bought a pair of sunglasses." How I envy him. How I would have loved to say that sentence when, back in the fifties, I played with my band around Arkansas, Mississippi, a bit of Missouri, and New Caledonia. However, he has never particularly impressed me. Postponed. Him and me. - You explained yourself well about the matter of applause. Be patient with our Canto del Condor. He's just a provocateur.

The "chief political columnist and historian of DeBaser" is, as usual, moderately provocative and biased. But this can no longer be surprising, as his visceral, natural, and indeed remote antipathy for the more or less young and infamous figures from social centers (and elsewhere?) is well known. This time, however, he appears less repressive and even "good" in his conclusions (although I would still like to ask him what he means by "except for some exemplary punishment"). That said, for my part, it's fine for everyone to make (or not make) their choices according to their own judgment. Also because I do watch Russian league matches sometimes. But know that Italy is not the Netherlands. Thinking that one can fight more or less organized crime, but usually more so than less, with anti-prohibitionism is just a nice little fairy tale to tell children. By the way, I refrain from commenting on the therapeutic properties of marijuana. I will never deal with medicine, for my sake and especially for yours. There are still some good doctors around. Not mine. Unfortunately. But that is another story.

Take a woman. Treat her badly...

It has little to do with it. But the much-discussed cover of this much-discussed book (?) reminded me of Bukowski's infamous "Fucking Machine."

Grohl was not the bad copy of Cobain. He was the great drummer of a great band. Being remembered as the drummer of Nirvana was (and is) the best thing that could happen to him.

Five of esteem.