Katy Perry Teenage Dream
Voto:
Welcome to DeBaser! The review is passable, but the album is not, no, frankly NO.
Vasilij Vasil'evic Kandinskij Komposition VI (Composizione VI)
Voto:
The review, as always, is very, very beautiful, but it has that usual aftertaste of encyclopedic nature that I can't quite digest. There’s no need for words about the work itself: Kandinsky was clearly a genius, and his works testify to that with a power that, in the best examples like the one reviewed here, is rarely matched elsewhere.
Radiohead Fake Plastic Trees
Voto:
Welcome to DeBaser, and congratulations on your first review!
Arthur Conan Doyle Il Mastino dei Baskerville
Voto:
Excellent review, a book I am profoundly ashamed of not having read (but I have read the stories, and despite being somewhat repetitive, they are still truly brilliant).
Maximum The Hormone Bu-ikikaesu
Voto:
@seagullinthesky: "I only base my opinions on that little I see" = I've seen little = I've informed myself little. Right? And here's why I would be happy to review so many beautiful j-rock things, but I know they would be met with indifference since the vast majority of DeBaser users have seen little and therefore believe they are all just fools dressed as fools. Anyway, I hope I haven't been polemical because that wasn't my aim and, as always, de gustibus.
Maximum The Hormone Bu-ikikaesu
Voto:
@seagullinthesky: so since you don't understand it and you haven't informed yourself, then these are valid justifications that make you feel entitled to say it sucks. Now I'll also write a nice review of "Fullmetal Alchemist" after only watching the ending theme, and then I'll say that part is beautiful, but the rest sucks, justifying myself by saying that I don't really understand it and that I haven't done my research.
Maximum The Hormone Bu-ikikaesu
Voto:
These are the slightly more chaotic version of the Offspring, period, and the only decent thing they've ever produced is the second ED of "Death Note." @seagullinthesky: j-rock means Japanese rock and nothing else, just like visual kei means combining a visual aspect with music and NOT replacing it, so criticizing this music as a whole means lumping everything together in the most shamefully ignorant way possible. Oh, and the Japanese have the same amount of good taste as everyone else, maybe even more: if this cover sucks, it's because it sucks just like all the other covers of Maximum the Hormone (what a great name).
Santiago Calatrava Ponte della Costituzione (Venezia)
Voto:
@psychopompe: the issue of museum-cities and the rejection of modernity could be discussed for hours. Read this conversation and let me know what you think: Panoramio - Photo of l'ara pacis-prima dell'obbrobio veltron-rutelliano.
Maurizio Pollini - Wiener Philarmoniker Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart - Concerto per pianoforte ed orchestra in sol magg., K. 453
Voto:
@fusillo: "Ah, so, Benedetti Michelangeli happened to stumble into a RAI studio and those bastards recorded his performance. Mmhhh, you’re right, they played a nasty trick on him." Okay, here I understand that we’re not discussing, but you’re making fun of me. The use of the word "so" indicates that you’ve reached this conclusion based on what I wrote: and where have I provided you the reasons to arrive at this conclusion? Did I write that Benedetti Michelangeli was caught off guard and recorded without his knowledge? It doesn’t seem so to me: he recorded for RAI, made a mistake because anyone can make mistakes, and when he wasn’t satisfied, he prohibited its publication. The rest is your own movie. Since being made fun of is one of the 16 things I hate, I would say enough. Foleba.
Maurizio Pollini - Wiener Philarmoniker Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart - Concerto per pianoforte ed orchestra in sol magg., K. 453
Voto:
@fusillo: I'm only talking to you about the sound issue and you keep shifting the conversation to staging, the score, and other aspects, so it's better to conclude everything. I'll leave you with the note that I have that CD by Benedetti Michelangeli, and the booklet states that it's a recording for Radio Rai, in the studio, and it was never published because of the fatal error; Warner released it only AFTER his death. Period. About the model of the piano: there are many, better and worse, what should we do? By the way, previously you found performances with period instruments nonsensical, even though they differ significantly from current instruments (but probably, I sense, for you this and this are the same thing), and now you are nitpicking among piano models? Alright, goodbye, see you next time.