Voto:
Here I am, read it. I found myself in many of the feelings described (you should know that I too experienced a "considerable shove," due to an experience that was both dangerous and grotesque in Montmartre, which I'll avoid recounting). Come on, send us something too when you go back there at Christmas.
Voto:
I had forgotten to comment again: I watched the second one and I still give it a 5; the script, in particular, I think is of an extraordinary complexity. And then it ends in the classically cruelest way for a series, leaving you anxiously waiting for the third one. By the way, I watched the third part of La Casa de Papel, which I found exceptional; now I'm also anxiously waiting for the fourth.
Voto:
Yes, I know, but a quote like that isn't exactly the best way to introduce a band that has evolved so much that it feels like listening to two different groups, those of the 90s and those from the 00s onwards.
Voto:
I discovered them recently: I find them exceptional: the albums from Hex to the latest one are all better than the last. With the previous, excellent "Primitive and Deadly," there was another shift from the style developed up to the two "Angels of Darkness, Demons of Light," and this new one further develops the discourse, once again eliminating the vocals. As far as I'm concerned, 5 stars just like all of them from Hex onwards. The review isn't bad (aside from the errors), but "Black Sabbath in slow motion" might have been a fitting description for the first 3 albums: now they are doing something entirely different, and they have become a great band.
Voto:
Yes, it's true that the reviews of the individual pieces have broken, but when they are exclusively a pretext for reflections and sharing of this kind, so be it.
Voto:
And it's already 3, I need to catch them up here.
Voto:
Aaron, you review well, nice words, great choice of the album, I like your assessment style, now you can go. Do you know what the procedure is? I don’t give grades, you don’t catch them.
Voto:
These have been on the list for a while. Really nice catch!
Voto:
As I've said many times, in my opinion, the problem here isn't how many times an album is reviewed, but how it's done: the review itself is closer to a definition than to an actual review. Anyway, I won't vote since it's your first one.
Voto:
As you know, I had listened to "Silent Cry" right after reading your review; there were some things I liked, but not enough to motivate me to delve deeper.