MuffinMan Banned

M. Poletti if I have to watch a movie for its social, political aspects, etc...(and judge it ONLY FOR THIS among the 100 masterpieces HAHAHAHAH, sorry but I can't continue in the comment in parentheses) I'll watch a documentary (which is definitely more exhaustive) or read a history book Gone with the Wind is a sentimental bore for two cents that winks at the viewer (popcorn and cola style) like even a high-class prostitute wouldn't. As for your lessons dear Poletti, given your untrained eye (maybe more your finger on the keyboard and the blah blah you think is intelligent) I really don't want any lessons, I'd rather know how to watch (when it comes to films) than to know how to babble nonsense taken from "the manual of the petty film critic" (subtitle the M.(erdaccia) Poletti). I bet you don't know what to say about Spielberg who revolutionized this shit (unless the meaning of revolution has been lost, which is likely) my dear little pirletto.

Forget being postponed until September, but EXPELLED from debaser for life.

then you’re really a buffoon because besides movie titles that I reiterate wouldn’t even be worthy of being in 500th place, they’re also in order of preference. You’re truly a born comedian.

Luckily, I don’t even have crumbs because that’s on your level, what analysis should I do frame by frame (I don’t consider myself a critic despite you) but I know how to look and moreover who has the desire to comment on a film that is half assed (like you). Come on, little chick, go read what the critics are saying about Spielberg’s new film so you’ll know what to say since you haven’t told me what he has revolutionized, perhaps his dick has revolutionized.

M.Poletti "intrigo.." the best Hitch PUAHHAHHAHHAHHHAHHAH do you know any others??

dear Poletti pollettino ino ino to me even if all the debeserians write that truman shop is the absolute masterpiece of cinema I couldn’t care less (I'm not like you who if they speak well of a film on tv sorrisi e pinzoni then I also speak well of it, regardless) the little film in question is watchable but the starting idea is really weak, it's a good concept but it remains just a sketch, among other things very "pleasing," there is no claustrophobia, it's so superficial and linear that even a heart rate monitor of a dead person would be so flat, expressionless.

I had only seen the 3 stars (but why then?) and I voted, but then I read the review and it made me laugh, but please fix the vote!!!!

Because there are movies that are much more important (certainly or probably less famous) that you haven't even listed, and sometimes there aren't even fundamental directors who have managed to unveil a new perspective for the viewer (va la va la te e truman scov).

But how can you give 3 stars to this garbage?

Pollettino Pollettuccio: Did Spielberg revolutionize it???? In what sense (if you can be brief) did he revolutionize science fiction? If there's a great craftsman, it's definitely Spielberg. Your list is not UNDISPUTABLE; it's simply BANAL (not to mention that many films aren't even in the top 500).