MuffinMan Banned

DeRank ™: 1,98

DeAge™ : 6944 days • Here since 7 june 2007

Nirvana Incesticide

7 feb 08

Voto:

Honestly, you are the one bringing up irrelevant and nonsensical arguments. In my first comment number 9 (where I absolutely did not talk about jazz or Zappa), you immediately brought up Zappa (post 11), which you couldn't have known I listen to unless you checked my nickname. And I repeat that I make the comparison with Nirvana in the context of pop/rock music, not with jazz or classical, etc. P.S. In my comments 55-56, I don't see that I've highlighted any intellectualism, adios companeros.

Nirvana Incesticide

7 feb 08

Voto:

sickman_84 tries not to write nonsense; bringing up jazz was precisely that generic individual, alessioIRIDE, who is clearly also a frustrated person. He went to check my comments to see what kind of music I predominantly listen to, just to attack me, and the ignorant one is him. It's the second time he insists on comparing a band with an entire musical genre that has over 100 years of history. Just take a look at how he's doing.

Nirvana Incesticide

7 feb 08

Voto:

Ah, one last thing, Nirvana is a little band that has left a mark of 0.1% in the history of rock, and listening to more than 30 seconds of their songs really grates on my nerves with the same chords and progressions throughout the entire album. Music where I already know how it ends after 20 seconds, I'm sorry, but it doesn't do it for me. If some people consider this garage band to be geniuses, well, that's their business. I certainly don't listen to them.

Nirvana Incesticide

7 feb 08

Voto:

alessioIRIDE I see that many comments have already responded on my behalf (Sanjuro). Only a populist like you could think that jazz is music for intellectuals when it is the most visceral music there is; sure, there is also "cerebral" jazz, but it's in a minor part (and it's also right that it exists)... No comment on Zappa.

Nirvana Incesticide

7 feb 08

Voto:

alessioIRIDE unfortunately for you, I don't only listen to (the brilliant) Zappa but to a lot of stuff, and my ears, when they hear Nirvana, tell me, how can certain people consider these guys innovative and good? And then I tell myself, either they are used to listening to nothing or they are adolescents (when I used to listen to them too) and I found them quite original...

Paul e Chris Weitz American Pie

7 feb 08

Voto:

Very nice, yes yes! So we should say that "La dottoressa..." "Giovannona..." are true masterpieces if this is a 4-star movie!

Auguste e Louis Lumière L'uscita Dalle Fabbriche Lumière (1895)

7 feb 08

Voto:

Good job, Pollè!

Nirvana Incesticide

7 feb 08

Voto:

But on this site, do you only listen to Nirvana (they made 3 bad albums) and there are 1,000,000 reviews? Or are you all 16 and under? Also, great musician Cobain can't be heard.

Kenny Garrett Beyond The Wall

6 feb 08

Voto:

It's a matter of practice, it's not that hard, I have 2 friends/acquaintances, one primarily plays the clarinet and bass clarinet, while the other plays the tenor sax, and both know how to use them. Keep in mind that this doesn't mean being able to play for 10 minutes straight without stopping, because it's still impossible to maintain circular breathing for a very long time; the air in your lungs runs out! But if you think about it, many saxophonists over 50 use this technique; they can still perform staccato while maintaining a circular breath to create various "effects". Anyway, Roland Kirk, Rollins, Coltrane, Roscoe Mitchell, David S. Ware (these guys make extensive use of it), Dave Douglas, but really many others. The straw thing is true.

Kenny Garrett Beyond The Wall

6 feb 08

Voto:

Beautiful both for how it's written and for the chosen author and album (which I'll obviously look for). Conte, you see that most professional saxophonists use circular breathing; it's an almost mandatory technique.