MuffinMan Banned

Congratulations!

By the way, are you talking about "Raging Bull" by Scorsese???? I mean, it’s from 1980, not 1971!!! And indeed, the director is a certain Martin Scorsese...

Alright, then you're inept. First you say that an editor wants to give the Oscar to the director (rightfully so, if he was the one who set everything up and the editor just did the manual work), "the director makes the difference and directing makes the difference are two phrases that mean the same thing." What are you saying??? The rest is just a contradiction of what you said before, so goodbye, know-it-all...

ADRIAN, can you read?????? Where do I judge the movie? I only said that maybe he’s right, but I haven't given any judgments on the film... but then again, someone who rates Max Pezzali four stars probably doesn’t get it.

Indeed, I mentioned it (in one of the first posts) dear Nes, but you evidently don’t read or don’t understand. A good director does it precisely because they know how important editing is, and they can do it not necessarily in the direction plan, which is another thing altogether. They might have it all figured out even just in their head (have you ever heard of free cinema from the '60s? Wise guy from school). It’s the DIRECTOR who makes the difference, NOT THE DIRECTION! "Get the latest films by Tony Scott," but also the early ones! Are these your big-name directors? I only said that I don't know the other director, but I’ve never even heard of any great films by this director, and I didn’t pass any judgments on merit. Among the many European directors, you mentioned one that is undoubtedly less important (and you said that yourself, by the way!). I’m not about to read all your poor comments; I just went to Kim's review since I know his films and since it was a recent review, and I didn’t see your pompous comments…
As for the rest of the mediocrity of your discussion, I won't even bother commenting.

on the contrary, it is the foundation

"Besides the shots, there are the dialogues of the characters and the director's notes (for each single shot). Good thing it's not editing! One who claims he knows and fills his mouth only with the big names everyone knows, and you bring me two directors who are a bit too few, for someone alternative like you who knows a wealth of unknown directors... I've only seen "Old Boy," "Lady Vendetta," and "Mr. Vendetta" by Park Chan-wook, an interesting director, but no masterpieces. I don't know Moodysson, but I don't think he has made 'indispensable' films... Anyway, here the professor was you, saying that I'm talking about directors everyone knows, while God knows how many you know... I repeat, it's obvious that a film having all (or many) top ingredients is a masterpiece, but it's also true that editing is one of the fundamental bases of cinema..."

in fact, I didn't want answers

I searched for the legend to make it quicker with copy/paste, but I made it clear 3 posts ago that they are 2 different things.

"this happens through the writing of the shooting script" dance! the shooting script is the choice of shots (CU: Close Up, MS: Medium Shot, CA: American Shot, WS: Wide Shot, the entrance of the characters, etc.) P.S: by the way, give me names of lesser-known but valuable directors whose films you've naturally seen, without looking them up on Google, be careful because if I know them I’ll ask you questions... for example, on the front page until a few days ago there was a film by Kim Ki Duk (to say now that he’s unknown is risky) but a highly regarded director who has recently appeared. I haven’t seen your comments on Avatar, which 6-year-olds know; you wrote poems... well, these little know-it-alls of today!