MuffinMan Banned

great movie, beautiful review.

“YOU USED IT TO SAY THAT HE HAD NO ACCOUNT IF HE SAID THAT EDITING IS THE FUNDAMENTAL PART OF CINEMA!!!!” It’s actually poorly written, but I thought you could get there. I mean, you quoted a phrase of yours that has nothing to do with it (“if for you the phrase 'hitc knew a thousand times more than me and you put together' was to denigrate him”)—I was obviously referring to the one before about what Hitc said about editing... Again??????? I SAID THAT EDITING IS ONE OF THE FUNDAMENTAL AND MOST IMPORTANT THINGS IN A MOVIE!!!! and whether you like it or not, it is! You gave absolutely inappropriate reasons without ever explaining them and even worse, contradicting yourself every time! The reviewer, if he doesn't want emails in his inbox, should click on "I don't want to receive emails anymore."

nessuno said also "the little teacher with the vibrating ass" hiding behind the ungrammatical post (I'm not here to write essays) the most serious thing is that you don't know what to respond because you don't even know what you're saying.

Ooooooops! We are informed that on this site there are one hundred and fourteen other reviews of St Anger, but this reader couldn't care less and prefers to give his nice rating of the album and the review because today he feels alternative and way too rebellious.

because you can't even select the sentences you yourself say 8o you play clever)?????? that of Hitc that YOU USED TO SAY HE DIDN'T HAVE ANY ACCOUNT IF HE SAID THAT MONTAGE IS THE FUNDAMENTAL PART OF CINEMA!!!!! you see, I can vote for a review (if I don't know the work) based on how it analyzes and writes, how many reviews have I voted on without knowing the album and if it talked well about it I might have even bought the cd! just as I can give a low vote to a review (even if it speaks well of it) of a great album or film! Also, I think I said I'm sorry to insult you, but often you act dumb on purpose (see among other things your sentence just quoted from Hitc, which obviously was not the "accused" one) or you twist things.

Maybe it’s you who doesn’t understand WHO IT IS that, acting all smug, told me I was quoting famous directors???????? Then I replied in kind, and if you took it as an affront because I mentioned a director who claimed (but he’s not the only one) that editing is one of the fundamental phases of a movie (then you go on and act all superior with phrases to demean Hitchcock, but who the hell are you?)... Then you really are a loser; I just mentioned 3 masterpieces (is it my fault they were called Welles, Godard, and Eisenstein?) of cinema that are so because of a very specific choice: editing... and who the hell told you that I don’t know other, less "famous" directors? I just said I wasn’t familiar with one of the 2 you mentioned (to be honest, both are minor directors)... last thing, I come to read the reviews, idiot, I’ve never voted for the film, jerk (sorry to offend you, but you’re a bit slow on the uptake).

too long... you are the one who insulted me by saying that I named directors that everyone knows, so I asked you, from your high wisdom, which ones you think I should name... that's all! if someone speaks and uses wrong terms (it happens to me too, for heaven's sake) but then I don’t justify myself by saying that it's the others who didn't understand! the script can be complex and a plot can be trivial and describable in 2 lines... for the rest, I have nothing against you, it's just that you act arrogant and you don’t know a damn thing...

I saw it a long time ago and I don't remember it well, but it didn't excite me; I too felt a sense of something missing...

Delorenzo, you are great!

I'll take the last word by force since you don't even know the nonsense you write: "the discourse on SCREENWRITING I would say is quite STUPID TO TALK ABOUT. ANYONE who went to see it ALREADY KNEW (thanks to the imm(ense) advertising campaign done in the three months prior) EVERYTHING ABOUT THE PLOT..." okay nobody, make peace with your little brain.