Hell

DeRank : 17,41
DeAge™ : 7051 days • Here since 20 february 2007
Dark Funeral Attera Totus Sanctus
Voto:
@Stoney: "Everyone wants to stand out, everyone wants to say they listen to complicated things, but no one wants to commit to listening. [...] Black and almost all other genres pretend to be niche, but in the end, they offer immediate and appealing things (in a single word, as someone mentioned above, 'cool') that are easily grasped, but dressed up as if they were something exceptional, so you understand them right away and perhaps even believe you've educated yourself about something." As far as I'm concerned, I don't think this is my case, since I'll listen to any CD handed to me as long as it's not the usual glossy crap like Tokio Hotel or something like that. What I know and what I think—my opinions, my beliefs, and even my philosophical orientation—are not due to a musical genre. They're due to me because I took a personal interest in studying certain topics, picked up books, and got to work, period. Then, if while sorting through all musical genres I find that even in black there are some who tackle rather particular themes that generally aren't found around the corner, then great, I read them while listening to the music and may find satisfaction, not because "it’s niche," not because "there's double bass or really heavy riffs," but because it attracts me for what it is and because I like channeling the sensations it can convey. I couldn’t care less if something is "evil/mean/good/happy/generic/margi nal/syrupy/whatever," the fundamental question is: does it communicate emotions to me? If yes, then great; if no, then I toss it all, even if it’s "truefuckingnorwegianblablabla." It seems obvious to me that no one can develop a solid culture just by listening to black metal; I would be very careful in saying that. I just say that often I find that many lyrics can be better than others, and so maybe even the music. Then, if there's someone who truly believes they can educate themselves with one specific genre, they've misunderstood, because to really educate yourself takes a lot of effort and several books open on the desk, certainly not a little song that can be as deep as you want, but if it were truly that useful, it would have been included in school books or else. "I believe that no matter how much one delves into philosophical aspects, the reasons why a blackster buys CDs of this music are unfortunately the painted faces, the double bass, the really heavy riffs, and that's it." It depends far too much on the cases; it’s all too relative because not all blacksters are like that. You probably have only encountered blacksters/metallers who think that way, but I know quite a few who don’t just see the double bass and the heavy riff... Not all of us are like that. We're not all closed-minded, much less so childish as to judge a specific musical genre based on how much double bass is in it. There are those who think: 'double bass + heavy riff = oh, how much it spakkkkaaaaa' and there are those like me who say 'music + experienced emotions = it's beautiful and I like it.' "Satanism, paganism, all the rest are things that serve to give it a more dignified dimension and an aura of seriousness that otherwise it wouldn’t have." This is likely, but like every musical genre (be it popular or not) has its more frequent themes to address, which can be appreciated or not; that very often there's an abuse of satanism and paganism to glam up the genre and make it more 'worthy' is beyond doubt, but there are always those who explore much different things regardless of the treated context and mainstream possibilities. There are always exceptions, and it’s wrong to generalize too much... "It’s purely a matter of exterior, of form, of appearance, and especially of provocation, and that, there’s plenty of." Most people might indeed think like you said, but I assure you there are many who consider what they listen to very simply "music to live by." Then, if you hate black metal and those who listen to it, there's really nothing I can do about
Dark Funeral Attera Totus Sanctus
Voto:
Yes. First and foremost, I would mention Deathspell Omega, practically my favorite Metal band. "Si Monvmentvm Reqvires, Circvmspice," "Kenose," "Fas - Ite, Maledicti, In Ignem Aeternum" are proof of how black metal can be as intellectually demanding as it is able to deeply contemplate the entity commonly known as "Satan"; if you read their lyrics, alongside numerous citations from biblical and apocryphal texts and a truly refined use of language (including Latin), you will find many metaphysical (and not only) reflections expressed in genuine philosophical terms, of course with a hint of cruelty and even macabre irony (after all, we are still talking about black metal). To further demonstrate their ability to present the concept of Satanism not merely as "Satan, I adore you" but in a much more complex way, I recommend reading the lengthy interview on Ajna Offensive (I think it’s spelled that way), one of the very few they have given... The band discusses a lot of historical and philosophical aspects that at first glance seem unrelated to their albums, and they even declare that they do not always understand the image of "Satan" they evoke in the Catholic Christian sense. In any case, whether with a Christian meaning or not, those Deathspell Omega are a fountain of knowledge; they know how to address topics in a cryptic but simultaneously thorough and contemplative manner, and they themselves believe that today’s black metal is undergoing a gradual process of deterioration. I think they are one of those bands that keeps the European black scene, if not the global one, alive. It's a shame they don’t play live. By the way, they, like me, believe that lyrics and music should go hand in hand as one inseparable entity.
Dark Funeral Attera Totus Sanctus
Voto:
Oh my God XD I woke up 5 minutes ago and I’m already faced with heaps of pros and cons XD So... @Stoney: Yes, there are ways and ways to talk about the concept of "Satanism" without being thought of as idiots, at least that’s what I think; if to you the concept of Satanism is already, a priori, a joke, it only depends on the levels of tolerance a person has and, in this case, also on the phenomenal and indispensable DeGustibus :). Anyway, I don't feel like defining myself as a "black metal fan." Sure, I listen to a lot of Metal, but damn, there are hundreds of other artists/genres that I will never get tired of listening to; I also don’t like being defined as a metalhead and honestly, I don’t want to be labeled in any way; it seems a bit reductive... Everyone is what they are, after all. @Fallen: Mmmh... I could partially agree with what you said, but I think this is the fourth studio album and they haven’t changed anything at all, except for a more tolerable sound compared to the first album "The Secret of the Black Arts." I mean, by the fourth album, shouldn’t you try to change a little? And will the next album (assuming there will be another) be like this again? Sure, it’s all brutal-fast-shooting and flawlessly technical (because I don’t doubt that DF know how to play, quite the opposite!), but unfortunately, as far as I can see, Swedish black metal is rather difficult to evolve into something more interesting and "avant-garde" (a term to be taken with a grain of salt). @Alì Murtacc: You know, I must admit that I didn’t dislike Diabolis Interium either; however, this ATS seems to me like a poorly made copy of its predecessor. @Jawbreaker: No. I started listening to DF without even knowing what they were doing (imagine, at first, I thought they were doing doom) and little by little, I realized how static these guys were, for me and therefore IMHO. I didn’t get to know them knowing everything about them, obviously! I was looking for something in this band that could impress me in some way, but I didn’t succeed. Would this indicate huge musical ignorance? I don’t think so; because I don’t believe I’m the only idiot who has looked for something "special" (I couldn’t think of a better term) in a band or any artist (not necessarily DF) without being able to pull a spider out of a hole... Being disappointed by a band from which you expected a bit more brilliance doesn’t seem like a symptom of ignorance. But as I see it, I’ve discovered hot water; sorry, I’m late to the party, and I apologize for telling you things you already knew...
The Rolling Stones The Rolling Stones, Now!
Voto:
Nice album, but I didn't find it to be a 5; rather a 3.20. Rece: 4.65 --> 5. Rock'n'roll greetings.
Judas Priest Nostradamus
Voto:
I apologize for the final repetition of "unico." I'm in a hurry..
Judas Priest Nostradamus
Voto:
@GenneMaia: uhm, well, you're free to think as you wish, but I'd like to comment on your last statement "the Judas are always the Judas." Like, if they were to make a concept album about Cesare Borgia with the background music of the Smurfs' theme, would it still be acclaimed? Maybe I was wrong to make some judgments based on the past of the Judas, but considering this a magnificent album just because it's labeled as Judas Priest seems a bit a priori to me. After all, I'm not the only one who considers it a solid brick...
Camel The Single Factor
Voto:
And I, on the other hand, do not hold back at all; I struggle to tolerate this CD. Rece 4.4 (without a decimal point). Dromedary greetings.
Deicide Till Death Do Us Part
Voto:
To me, more than a feeling of déjà-vu, it gave the idea of a generous shovelful of sludge.
Judas Priest Nostradamus
Voto:
I'm going to listen to Defenders of the Faith :-P
Lux Occulta Forever Alone - Immortal
Voto:
Sly, here the avant-garde is just a slight contamination; if you want something truly avant-garde (but in an unbelievable way, you know), download "The Mother and the Enemy," I reviewed that one as well.