Hetzer

But has the latest Oppenheimer come out?

Well, a infamous tale of an Italic dream in reverse that could have been told with more levitas and more flair.. Unfortunately, the introduction is unclear and the ending is wrapped up in a rush.. What a shame!

Ah, I almost forgot: Rovelli seems almost unaware of it, but aside from the necessary acknowledgment of the importance of "Eastern" thought, his book is in fact a solid monument honoring the triumphs of the Western scientific method.

Book read during two sunsets on a white, undefined Atlantic beach. The context surely helped me connect with the cosmic majesty of the subject. It's well written; my favorite part is the first, a nice recap of the history of black holes and relativity, even though it focuses very little on black holes as celestial bodies. The reflections on scientific thought, curiosity, and the (relative) measurement of all things are also very beautiful.

It's a shame that when it comes to "his" theory, the author gets a bit carried away with enthusiasm, seeming to celebrate victory too early. I didn't like the attitude towards the information paradox, a problem that theoretical physicists wrestle with, which he dismisses in three seconds because "white holes exist after all." The tone is unfortunately provincially Italian and subtly unpleasant, but nonetheless, it doesn't take much away from the overall value of the work.

Stylistically, it is engaging, effective, and light, but again, the lowercase inserts, like clusters of thought flows, are annoying and come across as unprofessional, as well as the often unwarranted use of Dante quotations, not even in quotes, as if Rovelli wanted to appropriate them.

In short, I understand the reference to his "dislike" made by @[federock] in the comment above. It remains a very interesting book with a high level of popularization, even though it requires a minimum prior knowledge of the subject.

I believe I've said it before, but just in case, I'll reiterate: I'm among those who find Ashton Smith's prose too heavy and derivative. Despite the stylistic excess that they both share, Lovecraft has always seemed to me more measured, or rather, more studied and effective. But the matter of the "Zotique" cycle is intriguing; is there any complete edition, even in the original language? You are a gourmet of the fantastic, after all, and that deserves respect.

But do they still exist?
I can picture them well in a gig with 99 Posse, sealed in a 20ft container, in the dark with a 12cm Opinel hidden in a corner...

Eeeeh, you can smell the whiff of black tide here... Law Scielba where are youuuu???

I liked the story, I liked the review, I liked the anecdotes... That's how it's done, well done!
The film itself is so classic that passing judgment on it seems almost pointless... I watched it again recently after about thirty years; technically, it is one of the best classics (perhaps "Pinocchio" is slightly better), and of course, the dwarfs are the Alpha and Omega of the film; without them, it would have been dazzling mannerism from silent cinema.

It's clear that during the school holidays in Albania, you got hit with the package, because now you're gushing over cheesy films... A reggaeton song about wet thighs at Puss in Boots is just a moment away, right? You're also worried because you need to change the tires on that sixth-hand Audi and mom isn't paying, which is understandable... Between the annual padel subscription (City Life Padel, not some crap, because there you really show off and act muy macho), the weekly fee for the Thursday party-fun, and the threats from that ugly gypsy who lives two blocks away, this must be a tough time. And the Excel files that haunt you are lurking there... But seeking comfort by going back to a site full of old folks that makes you sick and is about to close won't help you... A loving extra vote to remind you that Tinder and Bacheca Incontri are smarter, cooler, and with less vdm around...

The review sounds a bit lackluster to me.. Since it concerns a character that seems to be "divisive," it needed a bit more flair, some big words!