sentence

go take a shit

And for what reason shouldn't one vote for a collection, I ask you?

dear friends, instead of talking nonsense, copy the link and read the name of the true author of the review (which for me would also be worth a 5). it's a shame to choose an album like volume 3 to indulge in cheap show-off antics. couldn't you have copied one about Fabrizio Moro?

Ezekiel, with copy and paste I can manage a double 5 too. But I don't expect a Ligabue fan to understand it... never mind ;-D

in fact, I didn't believe it even for thirty seconds

Stuff for fascists and pseudo metalheads.

get yourself processed, clown.

I don't understand what the first question you asked has to do with this. I don’t claim to provide an objective and unquestionable judgment, and I don’t do that. I can only say that viva la figa doesn’t satisfy me for the reasons I’ve already listed (if you’ve forgotten, reread the comments; I think I’ve argued this point enough, as if I were talking about the damn Beatles). A person cannot love an album that doesn’t endure over time. How the hell can you love an album that, by the third listen, has already told you everything? I like ok computer because even after twelve years, I still listen to it from start to finish, with the same enthusiasm. No, it wasn’t enough to just say “exactly” because, simply put, the album must LAST. It has to continue to please me; otherwise, it’s disposable music, no more and no less than the aforementioned aserejé. On innovation, I won’t argue with you; I’ve never cared much about it, though, when it is present, it can only please me (IF I like the album). Responding to the end of the interview, I’ll tell you that yes, for an album to seem valid to me, it has to last quite a while. As for the rest, I don’t know what to say; I just want to reaffirm that I speak for myself and not for others. As for the other debasers, with all due respect, I really don’t care that much.

from above, not from the other.

let me say that, since I introduced the concept of duration over time, I will also know what the hell I meant. your interpretations make sense, but they are part of a conversation that no one has started. when I say duration over time, I mean duration over time. period. if you mean the relevance of sound, recording techniques, or who knows what else, then we are changing the subject. if I say that the sky is blue, you can’t say that I said “the sky is yellow” to bolster your opinions. that said, you’ve discovered hot water. that we are talking about subjective evaluations is understood. because what did you think, that I was looking for absolute truth in Scaruffi style? the record can be liked or not. thankfully you told me. I know it too, and in fact I’m telling you that I don’t like it. as I stated before “this record is very well packaged, cute and fragrant but essentially it is music that doesn’t leave a mark. I doubt I will revisit 'viva la figa' in a few months, and that’s the reason for my harsh review. a cute record isn’t enough to get 4 or 5 stars, and whether you believe it or not, I’m not relying on prejudices about mainstream or commercial music to say this. I simply took the record, listened to it, liked it, but after a few listens it pissed me off. end of story. then a lot of people comment just to seem intellectual, trashing the pop record at the top of the charts and praising unknown obsessives just because the expert of the moment said so. but I speak for myself, and I don’t answer for these people; it seems clear to me. I don’t like it when the sales talk comes up anyway; it’s an inevitable moment when discussing these little groups, and it annoys me. I’m not even going to explain why; you know it yourself. it seems like the last resort for the defense: “well, they sell like crazy, so there must be a reason”, this powerful bullshit. go check who’s at the top of Billboard and then we’ll talk about it again. (about neurodeliri, who told you nothing? I simply meant that I didn’t think I was saying anything absurd). and we reach the banal conclusion: “you could just say ‘I don’t like it’,” but what a drag, if we stick to “I like it” - “I don’t like it” we might as well shut down Debaser, what are we talking for? it’s pointless. this way you kill the discussion, the confrontation. for what purpose? to avoid arguing something (I like it or not) that is obviously implied? and for who, for Coldplay? go read the reviews on Captain Beefheart, and see how many enlightened souls without prejudices against the mainstream adorn themselves with linguistic refinements to trash Trout Mask Replica, from the height of their supposed objectivity. wasn’t it enough to just write “I don’t like it”?