KurtTheFish02

DeRank : 0,26
DeAge™ : 7153 days • Here since 9 november 2006
Friedrich Nietzsche L'Anticristo
Voto:
I believe the currents of thought in any field are obvious: there are those who would never vote for Berlusconi, those who declare themselves Islamic fundamentalists, and those who consider Nietzsche outdated. Many minds, many convictions.
Friedrich Nietzsche L'Anticristo
Voto:
Nietzsche has always left me wide-eyed, meaning: reading him evokes great feelings in me, leading to profoundly deep reflections. I will never stop trying to truly understand him; sometimes I fear that I am not up to the task (precisely because, as someone has already noted in the comments, he himself was able to look down on the same "man"). I deeply regret never having studied philosophy. I hope one day to meet someone knowledgeable in this regard who can enlighten me, perhaps through a worthy review (I won't rate this one).
David Fincher Seven
Voto:
Beautiful at the seventh ;-)
Larry Clark Ken Park
Voto:
Here perfect, it's also important to be able to judge one’s own actions, well done mourning_palace ;-)
Ridley Scott Blade Runner
Voto:
I don't like summaries (in this case, it could have been done with more care).
Ridley Scott Blade Runner
Voto:
Anyway, regarding the fact that our dear Deckard (Ford) may have a certain "something" non-human, I doubted it from the very beginning, when conducting the test on the beautiful Rachael, he needed so few questions to unmask her. Tyrell himself says that it would take at least a hundred to unmask her.
Ridley Scott Blade Runner
Voto:
A review that could have been lightened up but that I read passionately until the end. IMMENSE MOVIE. It might be worth reading the book, I'd say...!
Larry Clark Ken Park
Voto:
Here I am, as always, bothering everyone to ask for a minimum of constructiveness on the site, requesting to avoid unnecessary personal attacks. Personally, I happened to watch the film because it was passed to me during university. To me, it was a real nonsense; I judged it an American thing just for perverts and the perverted. But everyone has their own opinion (I’ve already expressed mine as a 1 in comment 16, so I won’t repeat it rightly). The review is unfortunately not exhaustive at all, really confusing, but it’s clear that there was some good intention behind it.
To the reviewer, just a few observations since I’ve read all the comments. Judging the ā€œworkā€ within this OUR community of a single individual simply by checking how many comments have been made and where or how many reviews have been written is extremely reductive. Is it possible that you have never experienced reading something just out of curiosity without being able to leave a comment? Furthermore, you wouldn’t believe how many times I would have liked to review albums I just listened to or movies I watched. Yet, I didn’t feel capable just because I preferred to leave this task projecting it into a ā€œpossible future,ā€ delegating it to someone who might feel more able to do it. Then it would have been up to me to express my satisfaction or not with what I would have read :-)
P.S. Also, be careful with user nicknames! I imagine there are some who use more than one; I used to be simply KurtTheFish, then that got blocked and I had to create a new one, quite similar at least ;-)
Stephen King It
Stephen King It
28 nov 08
Voto:
I remember as a child when on Sunday nights they aired this series... BBBRRRRR... my parents would watch it occasionally and I couldn't sleep at night!
Larry Clark Ken Park
Voto:
What a great load of crap this movie is.