thetrooper

PRECAZZO is CUNTGRINDER, right? Buddy, if it’s you, make yourself heard!

APPLAUSE FOR STIPE! Iron Maiden, inventors of Heavy Metal, and Dream Theater of Progressive Metal: he is absolutely right!

What does it mean to come out! And as for edmdero, he's a big (idiot) who listens to the most diverse things, not to mention a certain "simone" and a certain "marco": belly in the nth power!

The album is one of my favorites by 'Tallica, in fact, it’s my favorite! The review downplays the musical significance of the album and focuses too much on the lyrics! And sure, it may be a masterpiece, but it doesn’t exceed 9 out of 10!

I know the reviewer, he's one of my best friends, I introduced him to Slayer, Cannibal Corpse, Deftones, and DeBaser, for the rest I'm not responsible! He's the friend who recommended Breaking Benjamin to me, so I gave it a 5 because he's one of my most badass friends! The album makes my balls drop! UP THE IRONS AND UP THE MAIDEN!

I give it 5 because I know emdero, he’s one of my best friends even though we have slightly different tastes (I introduced him to Slayer, Cannibal Corpse, DeBaser, and Deftones; for the rest, I'm not responsible). Moreover, he's the friend who recommended Breaking Benjamin to me! All in all, he's a good devil! The album drives me crazy; the only acceptable Bizkit albums are "Results May Vary" (2.5 stars), the last EP (3 stars), and the first album (3.5 stars)! UP THE IRONS AND FUCK LIMP BIZKIT!!!!!!

I listened to the album many times and carefully, so I thought it would be appropriate to do a track by track review with a rating from 1 to 10 and then sum up all the songs to see what overall result the album gave. It seemed to me more than sufficient, but not by much! Also, I wanted to experiment with the track by track rating that I have never used in my reviews; if it’s not appreciated, I will return to the old method!

I don't know why, but the review didn't excite me that much; it talks too little about the album, which is a masterpiece and my favorite by Deep Purple, even though it's still decent!

In my opinion, the term "commercial" in metal and rock contexts is something abstract and not well-defined because we’re talking about a genre that has its following, yes, but only up to a certain point. It’s obvious that Deicide or Candlemass will never go commercial, but that’s because their (beautiful) albums are not as well-known as those of the "big" (forgive the term) names in metal: Ozzy, Sabbath, Maiden, Slayer, Metallica (who became even more famous by transitioning from thrash to rock). And among these, I’m sorry to say for the critics, we also have Korn, System of a Down, and Slipknot, who have reached an incredibly high level of popularity in recent years. So it’s clear that certain bands make choices that are "commercial," like unplugged sessions or compilations that (on the surface) seem to offer little (live & rare?). It’s all the result of an evolution that all bands go through sooner or later: the Maiden of "AMOLAD" are not the streetwise and more rock-style Maiden of "Killers," the Metallica of 2007 are not the furious and fast ones of "Kill 'em All," just as the Korn of "Blind" and their debut are not the same as the Korn of 2007. What I already wrote in the review of "SYOTOS" is called EVOLUTION, and this word encompasses unplugged sessions and the new melodies!

The mistake CoolOras makes is to regard a work solely for its dreary commercial purpose! Who cares if the Korn want to further pad their wallets with this live album; what matters is that they did it well, with professionalism and originality! I too had judged it a shameless move at first listen, thinking I'd wasted 20 euros, but by the third listen the album got stuck in my head, and its emotions and melodies struck me—whether it’s commercial is another matter! Please respond to me.