matteowolf

Oh, I forgot to tell you:
In this album, "Resta" makes blood gush out.

bye

p.s. "that is the communist" stands for "that is communism." It is still one fifteen in the morning :)

Sorry Extro, given that you've already extensively discussed the issue of "rude response" and it doesn't personally concern me, I wanted to specify that I told you your statement is not very persuasive because it really can't work for everyone: if you had said it to me, it would have gone badly for you :) Returning to the discussion, we need to separate the SUBJECTIVE field from the OBJECTIVE field: SUBJECTIVELY, for me, Montanelli's transition from the renunciation that was fascism to being the leading figure of an elitist right is only commendable. OBJECTIVELY, it is certainly better to have had a great journalist who did experience fascism but distanced himself from it, rather than one who could have continued to rot in a dead and buried ideology even in old age (like Mario Melloni, aka Fortebraccio, who as a Christian Democrat warned voters against the danger of "new Mongolian Islam," i.e. communism, and who as a communist would instead have come to say "I would like to be a circular of the PCI"). In any case, the judgment on Montanelli as a "slave of the masters" solely as a journalist and employee (and anything else you want to add) is not only unfair, but also historically incorrect and ineffective from all points of view!

p.s. I'm replying here for the usual reason, DeBaser hates me!

Extro91, you create a hell of a confusion about the sorrowful Madonna. Montanelli was expelled from the journalists' association for a critical article against the regime well before the outbreak of the war. Therefore, his "historical guilt" of having been a fascist remains, but it should be contextualized as an unhappy youthful choice. He became a proponent of a secular and moderate right when Mussolini was still in power, so much so that he was imprisoned as a "wanted man" and sentenced to death by the Germans. Moreover, he deserves credit for never wanting to tarnish that period of his life, admitting his mistake and recounting Mussolini’s inconsistencies ("who first criticized racism, then allied with Hitler, because as a good Italian he followed the crowd"). I think it’s you who needs to study. P.S. The expression "study Marx," besides being harsh-violent, is not very persuasive. I had to STUDY Marx’s Capital for the Political Economy exam with Professor Donato at the University of Teramo, who made us adopt only Capital as the textbook.
P.S. I’m replying here because DeBaser doesn’t allow me to respond directly to your comment, damn it.

Great review, the discovery of Montanelli years ago gave me the necessary push to take the big step and start my internship as a journalist: I’ve been working for two years at a monthly magazine, and for a month now also in the editorial office of a daily newspaper. A lot of work, clearly unpaid, just for the love of that genre (journalism) that falls somewhere between literary and whoredom, which everyone claims to hate, yet they end up eagerly reading pages of Fatto Quotidiano or Libero, without letting their loved ones see them. I don’t know the book, but you’ve piqued my curiosity enough that I might actually buy it.
p.s. @Stanislao: do you really believe the nonsense (historical and political) that you just said??

Damn, I've been writing for a newspaper for two years and I run a personal blog, aiming to become a journalist before August (when the "liberalization" of the profession will cause a lot of trouble), and I have always always always envied people with your descriptive ability! The context, very 'a la Irving', the smells, the moods, the colors…man, I really enjoyed reading you! On DeBaser, there are still those who put feeling into their writing, even when talking about wanking and gadgets with improbable graphics. Congratulations.
(p.s. I adjusted the rating of the work to match the rating of the review, I'm only 21, I couldn't grow up with Virtual Striker :( )

I'll share it on my Facebook too, fuck you.

Damn, I've been writing for a newspaper for two years and I run a personal blog, aiming to become a journalist before August (when the "liberalization" of the profession will cause a lot of trouble), and I have always always always envied people with your descriptive ability! The context, very 'a la Irving', the smells, the moods, the colors…man, I really enjoyed reading you! On DeBaser, there are still those who put feeling into their writing, even when talking about wanking and gadgets with improbable graphics. Congratulations.
(p.s. I adjusted the rating of the work to match the rating of the review, I'm only 21, I couldn't grow up with Virtual Striker :( )

I’ll start by saying that I also wrote a review of this album, which I now find rather "ugly," so I wouldn’t recommend it much. That said, "Burn" is truly a great album and, in the Deep's career, perhaps the most balanced alongside Machine Head. The song I listen to the least is the title track because after years of 'looping' it on the player, I've come to the conclusion that the riff is repeated way too many times, and it loses fluidity (for this reason, in my opinion, it remains a notch below Highway Star). On the other hand, Lay Down Stay Down still gets me pumped—terribly—just like it used to, and Ritchie's guitar work at the end of Mistreated (when his Fender cries, screams, and wails desperately, while the two leading ladies unleash their crescendo of high notes) moves me. A personal question: Sail Away is, in my opinion, a true gem, underestimated even by the Purple themselves. Where did you find all that information about this song?

Taxirider, I don't understand this "chic radicalism" in music. Who's stopping you from listening to your perfect unknown Fasten Belt while also enjoying some fun and raucous rock like that on this album? From the way you write, you seem like a caricature, straight out of the pages of Nonciclopedia. God save us!